Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

89 Conference Call


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

did he say he was going to throw more to T Smith? If not then I don't see your point.

Torrey Smith is the biggest playmaker on that offense.

You said Flacco wouldn't cater to 89....simply bc when asked he claimed he wouldn't. Yet 89 is almost exclusively the WR he throws to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torrey Smith is the biggest playmaker on that offense.

You said Flacco wouldn't cater to 89....simply bc when asked he claimed he wouldn't. Yet 89 is almost exclusively the WR he throws to

 

Not anymore he isn't but Flacco never said he was going to throw to him more or even a certain amount.That is the only way you could make the point that talk is talk.He never talked  so he didn't do something other than what he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not anymore he isn't but Flacco never said he was going to throw to him more or even a certain amount.That is the only way you could make the point that talk is talk.He never talked so he didn't do something other than what he said.

again, talk is talk. Doesn't mean much.

Flacco has almost turned that into a one WR offense. So claiming he won't give 89 extra balls doesn't mean nothing bc 89 is the only one getting them.

And no, just bc Flacco is ignoring him to throw to 89 doesn't mean he isn't the biggest playmaker on that O. Torrey is scarier than 89. So I hope Flacco continues feeding the mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, talk is talk. Doesn't mean much.

Flacco has almost turned that into a one WR offense. So claiming he won't give 89 extra balls doesn't mean nothing bc 89 is the only one getting them.

And no, just bc Flacco is ignoring him to throw to 89 doesn't mean he isn't the biggest playmaker on that O. Torrey is scarier than 89. So I hope Flacco continues feeding the mouth.

 

again ther is nothing to show that Flacco does not do what he says or will not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, talk is talk. Doesn't mean much.

Flacco has almost turned that into a one WR offense. So claiming he won't give 89 extra balls doesn't mean nothing bc 89 is the only one getting them.

And no, just bc Flacco is ignoring him to throw to 89 doesn't mean he isn't the biggest playmaker on that O. Torrey is scarier than 89. So I hope Flacco continues feeding the mouth.

Bs

T Smith had more targets than S Smith last week.

Go talk to any Ravens fan, T Smith is overrated by the media and other teams' fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, he claims he won't do something he already is doing.....

 

it is relative to how many passes he throws now not how many he threw to T Smith vs S Smith. More means beyond what he already is. since he already is throwing a certain rate you start from there not from where he was throwing to another wr before SS got there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bs

T Smith had more targets than S Smith last week.

Go talk to any Ravens fan, T Smith is overrated by the media and other teams' fans.

He had one more....and 89s on the year dwarf Torrey's.

Torrey has been their for 4 years and 89 3 games.....so yeah, Ravens fans are gonna be harder on him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is relative to how many passes he throws now not how many he threw to T Smith vs S Smith. More means beyond what he already is. since he already is throwing a certain rate you start from there not from where he was throwing to another wr before SS got there.

That makes no sense.

So if player X forces balls to player Y from day 1. He therefore will never do it bc he always does it....that is your arguement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...