Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thru week 4


CRA

Recommended Posts

Thru week 4

OFFENSE

2014

18.2 pts per game, 2 turnovers, 327 yards per game

2013

18.5 pts per game, 8 turnovers, 303 yards per game

DEFENSE

2014

24 pts per game, 6 takeaways, 342 yards per game, 8 sacks

2013

14.5 pts per game, 9 takeaways, 301 yards per game, 12 sacks

Neither the O or D in 2013 were deemed as playing good football thru week 4 last season. Week 5 of 2013 we started our run. Can we make a run in 2014? The D has a LONG way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offense was at 

24.5 per game at this point last year

24.25 this year

difference of 1 point through 4 games

Huh?

We averaged 18.5 last year thru the first 4 games last year, 18.25 this year thru 4 on offense

We have never even scored more than 24...can't average more than that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We weren't getting crushed last year in almost every phase of the game. I think we can turn it around but you cant compare it to last year with a much different roster, and much less toughness/attitude. we also had an easy part of the schedule in the middle of the season to soften the blow, we wont have that this year. This team is just soft, and in the worst spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...