Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thru week 4

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Thru week 4

OFFENSE

2014

18.2 pts per game, 2 turnovers, 327 yards per game

2013

18.5 pts per game, 8 turnovers, 303 yards per game

DEFENSE

2014

24 pts per game, 6 takeaways, 342 yards per game, 8 sacks

2013

14.5 pts per game, 9 takeaways, 301 yards per game, 12 sacks

Neither the O or D in 2013 were deemed as playing good football thru week 4 last season. Week 5 of 2013 we started our run. Can we make a run in 2014? The D has a LONG way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted

offense was at 

24.5 per game at this point last year

24.25 this year

difference of 1 point through 4 games

Huh?

We averaged 18.5 last year thru the first 4 games last year, 18.25 this year thru 4 on offense

We have never even scored more than 24...can't average more than that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Evodion Newbie

Evodion

Posted
Posted

We weren't getting crushed last year in almost every phase of the game. I think we can turn it around but you cant compare it to last year with a much different roster, and much less toughness/attitude. we also had an easy part of the schedule in the middle of the season to soften the blow, we wont have that this year. This team is just soft, and in the worst spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • kungfoodude
      The Carolina Panthers aren't ass!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Waldo
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By Waldo · Posted

      Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...