Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chicago Hope

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

I see a whole lot of sad faces on the huddle as of late. As your MFCEO, I am here to turn that frown upside down.

 

Allow me to inject a little hope into your emo IV drip. Turn down the Evanescence, and read on.

 

This Sunday the Carolina Panthers take on the NFC North's Chicago Bears. For a glance at how well the Panthers could do against the Bears, lets look back to our other NFC North opponent from week 2, the Detroit Lions. The Bears are not all that dissimilar to the Lions on paper. Pocket passer, large receivers, dynamic running back, 4-3 defense, etc....

 

The Panthers defense was able to allow only seven points to the potent Detroit offense. Detroit currently has the 10th ranked offense in the NFL. Chicago has the 16th.

 

Yes, but the Panthers are injured now, right? Yes and no.

 

Yes, Charles Johnson looks like he probably will not play on Sunday. In the game against Detroit, Johnson had 1 tackle. If Horton, Addison, or Ealy can muster a single tackle they will have matched Johnson's production. Mario Addison, on the other hand, registered three tackles, 2.5 sacks, and 4 QB hits. Addison is starting Sunday.

 

The only only other difference on the defensive side of the ball personnel wise is Josh Norman being promoted to starter over Melvin White. This may actually be an improvement against Chicago's large athletic wide outs (if Norman can maintain his composure.)

 

Thomas Davis is the healthiest he has been since the Detroit game where he lead the team with 12 tackles. Although his presence was desperately needed in Baltimore, having him healthy at home this week may be the difference in the game.

 

Defensively, the bottom line is this: Last Sunday, the Bears mustered only 17 points at home against Green Bay, who currently have the 28th ranked defense in the league. The Panthers defense has already proven once this year that they can dominate with the roster available to them this Sunday. Will they? That is entirely up to them.

 

On the offensive side of the ball, there are also reasons to be hopeful.

 

Byron Bell and Nate Chandler have looked horrible in the last two games. The good news is while those games were against  3-4 defenses. Chicago mainly sticks with their base 4-3. Bell and Chandler have performed average to above average against 4-3 defenses this season.

 

Yes, Deangelo Williams is out on Sunday. But he was out against the Lions as well. Jonathan Stewart may be back this week, but he only averaged 2.5 yards per carry against Detroit. Tolbert is also out, but he actually had -5 yards on the day. Stewart, Reaves, and Ogbonnaya may actually give the Panthers more options in play calling against Chicago.

 

Lets not forget Brandon Williams getting his first big shot this week. Richie Brockel is an excellent blocker and is out for this game. The Panthers have been abysmal in short yardage situations where Brockel is mostly used. Brandon Williams could provide a spark to an element of the offense that can't get much worse.

 

Offensive Bottom Line: The Bears have allowed at least 19 points every game this season. Cam Newton, Greg Olsen, and the receiving core are healthy and talented enough to put up touchdowns against Chicago. If Mike Shula can muster a somewhat respectable run game the Panthers should be able to put up 20+ points, enough to win provided the defense plays up to its potential.

 

 

Overall Bottom Line: The Panthers have the roster and the ability to win this game.

 

 

My prediction:

 

Panthers 24

Bears 20

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

Jeremy, I was talking with my friend about the last two games vs Pitt and Balt.  He said the defensive line isn't the problem right now.  He said because McD plays a soft cover 2 or a cover 2 man 99% of the time, offensive coaches have game planned around this.  They have started doing short drops to eliminate the pass rush completely and we don't have the horses for jam cover or cover 1.  He stated when you start getting beaten underneath 2 things happen: Cbs and safety's tend to creep up, and LBs move back and become less aggressive.  Then, your team is vulnerable to the deep ball, zone runs, etc.  Do you agree with this assessment or do you think it's other reasons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mbarbour21 Proficient

mbarbour21

Posted
Posted

That actually makes sense! Lol!

Especially our offense getting a break from 3-4s.

Anyway, I think we can get a few turnovers in this game. (WHICH HAS BEEN A HUGE DIFFERENCE) That will be the key to the game. We averaged 3 takeaways a game in the first two and ZERO in the last two. (If Im not mistaken) We obviously lost the last two.....bad.

Not many people will be picking us after the last two weeks. Chicago has a lot of firepower. We have to make that back-fire and force some TOs.

Panthers- 24

Bears- 13

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khaki Lackey Mentor

Khaki Lackey

Posted
Posted

They lack a pass rush. Rodgers put on a clinic for quarterbacking against them. He moved around in the pocket all game and tore them up. I'd love to see cam do the same. GB doesn't have a stellar Oline right now either.

If Rogers can "move around in the pocket," then their Oline is markedly better than ours.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toundra Newbie

Toundra

Posted
Posted

No hard feeling the Bears, but our team is injured, angry and mad, really really mad and you are on our way for the superbowl, our superbowl!

And you know what they say about injured animals? don't stay on their way.

Blood and guts !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...