Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staying together for the sake of the kids?


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

What is your view on hanging on to relationships when kids are involved?

 

I know a couple who don't have intimacy but more of a business/roommate arrangement to keep their kids happy. I think that was standard back in the day but couples are much more likely to divorce these days and let the kids deal with it.

 

I'm excluding abusive relationships and the like.

 

Not about me FYI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they attempting to work on their relationship or are they just being lazy and saying ohh there is no longer a spark. If they have legitimately made an effort to rekindle things it may be time to move on, if not they need to grow up and realize relationships take work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kids aren't stupid. They can read the body language of parents and can tell when things aren't right. Also, they will find a ton of ways to blame their parents problems on themselves. If financially possible, the best move IMO is to split, explain that sometimes relationships change between people, but as parents they will always love their kids and nothing will ever change that. If not financially possible, then the parents having individual rooms while co-parenting may be an option, but not really sure how that would work out. 

 

My parents stayed together even though it was obvious the spark had died a long time ago. I saw it when I was about 13 or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on this is next to nothing because I'm not a parent. But I feel when you have a child in the situation given you owe it to that child to give them a normal life growing up. And if it means spending a couple decades with someone you're not crazy about that's what you have to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on this is next to nothing because I'm not a parent. But I feel when you have a child in the situation given you owe it to that child to give them a normal life growing up. And if it means spending a couple decades with someone you're not crazy about that's what you have to do.

This. Except maybe not a few decades but if your kids are closer to an age where they are going to be leaving at 18 assuming college, work, etc...I think its worth it to stay together if you can be amicable for your kids.

My parents have been together my whole life and my bfs were divorced 12 years ago and it was not amicable.

Its amazing the differences we have between our families & how we interact, and its very obvious that majority of it spurs from that one event in their lives.

That was something that couldn't be avoided but the impact is certainly there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has two children from a previous marriage that was beyond salvageable.  She tried to "stay in it for the kids" for years, but it does more harm than good in the long run, which most people aren't able to see since it's such an emotionally invested scenario.  The kids grow up thinking this sort of contentious marriage/relationship is normal, and since she has two girls, that even worse...a husband/father being domineering and abusive is OK.  Instead, she and I promised to ourselves that we would offer a loving, supportive, and nurturing environment for the kids so THAT is what they see as the model relationship instead of a dysfunctional one.  I know not all people who get out of bad marriages with kids end up in better scenarios, the odds are the opposite...but in our case, it was the best for all involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has two children from a previous marriage that was beyond salvageable.  She tried to "stay in it for the kids" for years, but it does more harm than good in the long run, which most people aren't able to see since it's such an emotionally invested scenario.  The kids grow up thinking this sort of contentious marriage/relationship is normal, and since she has two girls, that even worse...a husband/father being domineering and abusive is OK.  Instead, she and I promised to ourselves that we would offer a loving, supportive, and nurturing environment for the kids so THAT is what they see as the model relationship instead of a dysfunctional one.  I know not all people who get out of bad marriages with kids end up in better scenarios, the odds are the opposite...but in our case, it was the best for all involved.

 

The scenario was a non-abusive relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ummm not sure adding anther 5'9 180 pound soaking wet forward is the way to go here.....    
    • What has happened in HS athletics busted full force into the college world with this NIL/transfer portal stuff. HS sports has been jacked up for a long time now. You have all these "prep schools" that are basically just diploma mills for athletes who hoover up all the good athletes they can get and they're all on scholarship. Then they go out and recruit decent athletes with rich parents to come onboard and pay outrageous tuition while they tout their success at getting their athletes college scholarships. Yeah, those athletes getting college scholarships are the same ones you're giving scholarships to so that you can use them to recruit the rich kids whose parents can pay for it all. You see the same thing in youth travel ball leagues. The whole thing is just getting crazy.
    • It's your right to refer to it as vague, but it still flouts the theory of "zero evidence" that Tepper is changing. Here's another: "Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales and general manager Dan Morgan are reportedly being given a larger leadership role within the organization. Panthers owner David Tepper 'has taken a more hands-off approach of late,' according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. 'He's trying to trust Canales and GM Dan Morgan to get it right, knowing that the roster requires patience in its current state,' Fowler wrote. 'We shall see if he holds to that.'" https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10146782-report-panthers-david-tepper-has-taken-a-more-hands-off-approach-to-team   ""David Tepper just wants to win and he's gonna supply everything that we need to win.. Things are changing around here and things are looking really positive" ~ Dan Morgan  https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/1917639137550627107?t=6vgo8yXTO6eD0Gb55hyzNg&s=19   From about 2:15-6:35, Julian Council, Locked on Panthers, gives his take on whether Tepper seems to be changing (and specifically referenced the war room in his analysis):    Dean Jones of Cat Crave on David Tepper in the war room. "He was an innocent bystander throughout a hugely important decision, placing full trust in Morgan and Tilis to make the right call." Jones also quoted Pat McAfee: "What I noticed though, at one point, they looked at (David) Tepper to get an answer, Tepper didn’t say sh*t. All anybody has said about Tepper is that he’s hands-on, hands-on, hands-on. Too handsy, too involved. He’s not letting the football people do their thing. We just watched in the biggest moment for their franchise, a top ten pick, he just sat there and let everybody do their jobs. I think if you’re a Panthers fan, you love everything you saw there." https://catcrave.com/silence-from-david-tepper-becomes-panthers-loudest-victory Granted, you're not getting a major headline here, but that's not going to happen anyway. Fowler isn't exactly a nobody, everybody knows McAfee, and you also have some locals that follow the team (including Dean Jones). Of course you have a right to believe that Tepper hasn't really changed, but to say there is no evidence that he just may be changing is not really true. It's just not. Hate the guy, but the way that he has handled this current regime is different than he handled previous teams, and his silence in the war room and publicly in general is different than years back.
×
×
  • Create New...