Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The best thing the Panthers did last week to increase chances of a win this week...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

By the Panthers just showing a little bit of Cam Newton running on a designed play it completely changed what defenses need to do against the Panthers now. Up until then, they hadn't spent much time worrying about Cam taking off. Even Marvin Lewis said they hadn't been worried about it until this week.

 

Now that they have seen it, the defense has to change significantly on how to cover the Panthers. Edges have to be contained instead of pushing forward to the pocket. Translation: Good news for Bell and Chandler

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also need to have Can working on his snap counts so we aren't always snapping the ball on the first hard count. It seems like the opposing DEs are getting huge jumps due to the predictability of our snap count. Throw in a few hard counts to draw them offsides a few times and you automatically slow them down the rest of the time. With two shaky tackles who are so susceptible to the outside speed rush I am surprised we have seen virtually none of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great point. The fact that McDermott also disguised our defensive coverages more in the second half...dropping linebackers and sometimes even a lineman into coverage and cutting back on blitz calls...also helps a ton. Before the second half last week the formula to beat our defense was simple: use quick, short screens. Our adjustments (finally) prevented the Bears from doing that in the second half and now forces teams to reconsider their strategy. We were a much better defense when we cut back on blitzing. And believe it or not, we got more pressure in the second half with just the front four than we did the last 2 and a half weeks when blitzing everyone. I just hope McDermott learned his lesson and carries this strategy into today's game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...