Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Conditioning of Star and KK- Is this going to be a longtime issue?


Matthias

Recommended Posts

Of course yall know me and my point of emphasis about starting Short along with Lotulelei.  However whether they start or not, we all have noticed Rivera shuffles his DTs like a deck of cards.  I don't only want to see them start, but I also like to see them take most of the defensive snaps.  Both guys are good at defending the run, and both can be a force in rushing the passer, particularly with Short.  As bad as our defense has been this year, and with our best D-lineman sitting at home, I want the rest of our best D-lineman out there on the field earning their check.

 

So I've asked the question on why does KK not start and why does Rivera shuffle at that spot so much? (Doesn't matter what down it is)  The answer I've received from many here concerning KK is conditioning.  That he doesn't conserve his energy well.  When it comes to Star, I remember when we drafted him, Rivera said they wanted to limit his snaps throughout the season or something to that effect.  It's season two for these guys, and it seems this is still the case.  Should we expect this to be the case for their careers?  If so, how much money should we spend on these guys when their contracts are up, if they can't even handle a full work load every game?  If by a miracle's chance a guy like Gerald McCoy enter the free agent market, should we go after him, and let Star and KK shuffle playing beside him?  What are everyone's thoughts concerning this because I'm kind of annoyed not seeing KK out there on most of the defensive snaps. (Keep in mind this is because he could be our best defensive lineman right now.  Of course CJ may be getting healthier and will start making his usually noise.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's conditioning. I believe the coaching staff has a philosophical belief that DTs should be rotated frequently. Going back to 2012, they've never had a DT take more than 67 percent of snaps (Dwan Edwards). 

 

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/snapcounts

 

You're right this could be the philosophy.  Though I do know Rivera wanted to limit Star's snaps his rookie year.  I think that has continued onto his second year.  The chart here says Short takes the most snaps after Dwan.  Ultimately I just want to see the guy who has the best skills, playing on the field.  If those guys are Star and KK, I should see them more than I see the other guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dwan has been good, not great.  He's come in and made some nifty, consistent moves at the end of games.  Joined in a couple of half sacks and so on, but I haven't seen him outright beat his man.  I haven't seen him explode into the backfield at any time.  He's more of your consistent, "little hits add up" type of guy.  If I had a guy who could blow guys up, I would rather they take more snaps.  I do think there is a drop off when KK and Star are not on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude it's not realistic for 2 DTs to play the entire game. You are going to get tired because your basically sprinting at the QB doing everything you can to push thru the line. If you keep them in the entire game they are going to collapse in the 2nd half of the game. Basically, you get alot of 4th quarter loses like back in 2011. The DT's just won't have the energy to push thru the line or run block as well. It is not about the conditioning at all really.

 

If you ever play hockey or a position like DT you have to constantly rotate because you will get tired. Keep in mind also that a DT is 300+  lbs so they will wear down say compared to a 200lb WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...