Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Flawed Defensive Philosophy


LA_Panther

Recommended Posts

We invested heavily on a D-line financially as well as with draft picks and stuff. We swept our secondary issues under the rug 

hoping a beast D-line putting pressure and stud linebackers making plays in the running game will be the ingredients for a great D.
 
Then the Hardy situation happened. Not sure what's going on with CJ and the tackles too, but our front 7 is not getting it done and our sorry secondary is getting lit up
 
The defensive disaster so far this year is a result of the putting-your-eggs-in-one basket philosophy and not addressing all positions of need. Hope we learn from what is happening this year. Hope we start addressing all positions. Instead of a juggling act where we hope that one area of need masks deficiencies in another. We are trying out Presley (WR) as a DB for God's sake. That should not happen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't go that far. If Hardy were playing and CJ wasn't injured you'd be seeing a whole different defense. Injuries/exempt players at a position of strength don't make the philosophy flawed. Was it flawed last year too? We had horrible talent in the secondary and were still the #2 defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hope we start addressing all positions. Instead of a juggling act where we hope that one area of need masks deficiencies in another. 

If you want to get good players you've gotta pay 'em. If you spread out the money you've got to address all positions, you get across the board mediocrity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't go that far. If Hardy were playing and CJ wasn't injured you'd be seeing a whole different defense. Injuries/exempt players at a position of strength don't make the philosophy flawed. Was it flawed last year too? We had horrible talent in the secondary and were still the #2 defense.

 

I am saying, this philosophy worked last year because our front 7 was playing lights out. We still got burned last year when we were not pressuring. My point is we have to address all positions of need. No one foresaw the Hardy drama or the inujries. What about Star? What about the run D? what happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am saying, this philosophy worked last year because our front 7 was playing lights out. We still got burned last year when we were not pressuring. My point is we have to address all positions of need. No one foresaw the Hardy drama or the inujries. What about Star? What about the run D? what happened?

 

They all benefit from each other and work together as a unit. If CJ was 100% and Hardy were playing the philosophy would be working. Spending Hardy's $13M on secondary help wouldn't be able to get enough to outweigh how important he is to the defense. Yes, a complete defense is important but we just don't have the cap space to maneuver. We chose Hardy, rightfully so if it weren't for the media's bullshit putting him on the exempt list, and that was the right choice. We will improve the secondary through the draft and once we get cap room. And taking picks of value are more important than reaching for a need. Ealy in the 2nd was amazing value and he could pan out and be a beast, on a rookie contract for a few years. No DBs were worth picking then, and we got a steal in Bene later on who's a quality starting nickel. Can't say the philosophy is flawed, when it's actually been proven to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been proven time and time again that games are won in the trenches. If you control them you usually win. The fact we arent doing that on either side of the ball is why we keep getting our ass kicked. I don't think a philosophy of spending to have a dominating front seven is a bad one, its just that due to a number of factors we aren't getting what we paid for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

caatfan, on 22 Oct 2014 - 3:06 PM, said:caatfan, on 22 Oct 2014 - 3:06 PM, said:

If you want to get good players you've gotta pay 'em. If you spread out the money you've got to address all positions, you get across the board mediocrity. 

 

Or, you can continue to scout good, cheaper talent across the board, bring them in and pepper them with some hardhitters at key positions that fit within your philosophy and try and exploit that window of opportunity while you can.   The Seahawks did it. The Pats, Steelers and Giants have arguably mastered that balancing act for a while now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...