Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing our secondary to Seattle's: both have been just as awful this season


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

so who feasts more? Cam or Russell Wilson? I'm going with Cam

our secondary has been awful this year, but SEA's secondary has been just as bad:

SEA - 103.9 QB rating allowed (5th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 100.3 QB rating allowed (7th-worst in NFL)

SEA - 68.3% completion pct allowed (4th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 70.0% completion pct allowed (3rd-worst in NFL)

SEA - 239.0 passing ypg allowed

CAR - 250.7 passing ypg allowed

SEA - 2.0 passing TDs allowed per game

CAR - 2.1 passing TDs allowed per game

SEA - 47.0% 3rd down conversion allowed (6th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 48.4% 3rd down conversion allowed (3rd-worst in NFL)

SEA - 7.0 sacks (3rd worst in NFL)

CAR - 15.0 sacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Times:

"The play of Tharold Simon. Starting cornerback Byron Maxwell is still out with an injury so that means the second-year corner Simon (a 2013 5th R pick) will start in his place. In his first career start (and game) last week, Simon got into a shoving match with a Rams player, was flagged for a costly unnecessary roughness penalty that led to a Rams’ touchdown and a fine from the league for Simon ... Simon has tons of potential, and he is the exact type of corner the Seahawks covet. But can he turn that potential into production?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Times:

"The pass rush: Another glaring (deficiency) is a lack of sacks — the Seahawks have just seven after getting 44 last year. Three of those came in the first game against Green Bay, meaning the Seahawks have gotten just four in the last five games. ... Cam Newton can be dangerous if given time. However, Seattle also has to make sure to contain Newton and not let him get out of the pocket and run. And the Seahawks will have to do that without middle linebacker, who was a key in keeping Newton in check in 16-12 and 12-7 wins at Carolina the last two seasons but is sidelined with a toe injury."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Post - Intelligencer:

"The Seattle Seahawks head to North Carolina to face the Panthers ... the defending Super Bowl champs (are seeking) their first win in 20 days.

...

Russell Wilson has more than proved his mettle ... it’s the Seattle defense that needs to step up against quarterback Cam Newton and the rest of a Panthers attack that ranks 11th in the league in total offense.

...

a Seattle pass rush that has been disappointing through six games needs to bring the heat and force Newton into making costly mistakes, or the budding superstar may make the Hawks pay with both his arm and his legs.

...

Do you think the Hawks will rise to the challenge on Sunday?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS Sports:

"We know that the Seahawks don't play nearly as well on the road as they do at home, but the ugly secret thus far of 2014 is that Seattle hasn't played well for most of this season."

Ben Watanabe, senior assistant editor, New England Sports Network:

"pick: Panthers. I’ve been teetering off the edge of the Seahawks bandwagon for weeks, and now I’m taking the plunge, big time."

Fox Sports:

"It's amazing how quickly fortunes and perception changes in the NFL. No longer are we discussing Seattle's vaunted defense, the "Legion of Boom" ... (As for the Panthers,) they got embarrassed (at Green Bay) and I expect them to show up for this game -- an opportunity to make a statement against a solid opponent, defend their home field and put claws into the NFC South lead ... This line opened with the Seahawks a 3.5 favorite and it's risen because the public still thinks Pete Carroll is going to wave a wand and fix the Seahawks. Not that easy, folks. Maybe he'll dial up some different blitzes to bring more pressure on opposing quarterbacks, but there's no quick fix. Right now nearly three-quarters of wagers are coming on Seattle. Let's hi-top fade them like it's 1990."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info but posting the links would be nice too.

 

With how bad both defenses have played, the stats that I want to see are red zone efficiency and turnovers. IMO those are what will determine the outcome of the game.

 

Team Opponent Red Zone Scoring Percentage (TD only)

30. Carolina 71.43%

31. Seattle 72.22%

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-red-zone-scoring-pct

 

Team Takeaways per Game

11. Carolina 1.7

29. Seattle 0.8

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/takeaways-per-game

 

 

So the only 2 things that give us a statistical clear edge on defense are sacks and turnovers. Which means we need to get to the QB often and aggressively attack the ball. Basic McDermott philosophy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CB Jeremy Lane is also out for Seattle. Rotoworld: "It's an underrated blow to Seattle's defense... Lane played extensively when Walter Thurmond III (who now plays for the NY Giants) was suspended last season, and graded out positively as a cover guy and run-support cornerback per Pro Football Focus."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...