Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing our secondary to Seattle's: both have been just as awful this season


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

so who feasts more? Cam or Russell Wilson? I'm going with Cam

our secondary has been awful this year, but SEA's secondary has been just as bad:

SEA - 103.9 QB rating allowed (5th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 100.3 QB rating allowed (7th-worst in NFL)

SEA - 68.3% completion pct allowed (4th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 70.0% completion pct allowed (3rd-worst in NFL)

SEA - 239.0 passing ypg allowed

CAR - 250.7 passing ypg allowed

SEA - 2.0 passing TDs allowed per game

CAR - 2.1 passing TDs allowed per game

SEA - 47.0% 3rd down conversion allowed (6th-worst in NFL)

CAR - 48.4% 3rd down conversion allowed (3rd-worst in NFL)

SEA - 7.0 sacks (3rd worst in NFL)

CAR - 15.0 sacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Times:

"The play of Tharold Simon. Starting cornerback Byron Maxwell is still out with an injury so that means the second-year corner Simon (a 2013 5th R pick) will start in his place. In his first career start (and game) last week, Simon got into a shoving match with a Rams player, was flagged for a costly unnecessary roughness penalty that led to a Rams’ touchdown and a fine from the league for Simon ... Simon has tons of potential, and he is the exact type of corner the Seahawks covet. But can he turn that potential into production?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Times:

"The pass rush: Another glaring (deficiency) is a lack of sacks — the Seahawks have just seven after getting 44 last year. Three of those came in the first game against Green Bay, meaning the Seahawks have gotten just four in the last five games. ... Cam Newton can be dangerous if given time. However, Seattle also has to make sure to contain Newton and not let him get out of the pocket and run. And the Seahawks will have to do that without middle linebacker, who was a key in keeping Newton in check in 16-12 and 12-7 wins at Carolina the last two seasons but is sidelined with a toe injury."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle Post - Intelligencer:

"The Seattle Seahawks head to North Carolina to face the Panthers ... the defending Super Bowl champs (are seeking) their first win in 20 days.

...

Russell Wilson has more than proved his mettle ... it’s the Seattle defense that needs to step up against quarterback Cam Newton and the rest of a Panthers attack that ranks 11th in the league in total offense.

...

a Seattle pass rush that has been disappointing through six games needs to bring the heat and force Newton into making costly mistakes, or the budding superstar may make the Hawks pay with both his arm and his legs.

...

Do you think the Hawks will rise to the challenge on Sunday?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS Sports:

"We know that the Seahawks don't play nearly as well on the road as they do at home, but the ugly secret thus far of 2014 is that Seattle hasn't played well for most of this season."

Ben Watanabe, senior assistant editor, New England Sports Network:

"pick: Panthers. I’ve been teetering off the edge of the Seahawks bandwagon for weeks, and now I’m taking the plunge, big time."

Fox Sports:

"It's amazing how quickly fortunes and perception changes in the NFL. No longer are we discussing Seattle's vaunted defense, the "Legion of Boom" ... (As for the Panthers,) they got embarrassed (at Green Bay) and I expect them to show up for this game -- an opportunity to make a statement against a solid opponent, defend their home field and put claws into the NFC South lead ... This line opened with the Seahawks a 3.5 favorite and it's risen because the public still thinks Pete Carroll is going to wave a wand and fix the Seahawks. Not that easy, folks. Maybe he'll dial up some different blitzes to bring more pressure on opposing quarterbacks, but there's no quick fix. Right now nearly three-quarters of wagers are coming on Seattle. Let's hi-top fade them like it's 1990."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info but posting the links would be nice too.

 

With how bad both defenses have played, the stats that I want to see are red zone efficiency and turnovers. IMO those are what will determine the outcome of the game.

 

Team Opponent Red Zone Scoring Percentage (TD only)

30. Carolina 71.43%

31. Seattle 72.22%

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-red-zone-scoring-pct

 

Team Takeaways per Game

11. Carolina 1.7

29. Seattle 0.8

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/takeaways-per-game

 

 

So the only 2 things that give us a statistical clear edge on defense are sacks and turnovers. Which means we need to get to the QB often and aggressively attack the ball. Basic McDermott philosophy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CB Jeremy Lane is also out for Seattle. Rotoworld: "It's an underrated blow to Seattle's defense... Lane played extensively when Walter Thurmond III (who now plays for the NY Giants) was suspended last season, and graded out positively as a cover guy and run-support cornerback per Pro Football Focus."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...