Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They Gambled. They Lost. It's That Simple.


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

I don't think it's just a matter of not having the cap money.

 

Gettleman's biggest mistake has been his 'collaborative approach', working with Rivera and others on all team decisions.

 

Mind you, I have no problem with the approach itself, but the problem is that Rivera is a horrible talent evaluator who defends 'try harder' guys even though the reality is they're just not good enough.

 

Rivera championed guys like Byron Bell, Nate Chandler, Charles Godfrey, Sione Fua, Armanti Edwards and others,  Heck, to this day he still defends them for 'doing their best" (insert Sean Connery quote here).

 

You wanna collaborate?  Fine, but collaborate with a guy who knows what he's doing.  Otherwise, you wind up like what we have now.

 

See, I think it's actually the opposite. I'm sure Rivera stands up for his guys and gives them good marks for effort but I don't think you would hear him openly lobby for better talent either. I think Rivera knew he was going into the season hamstrung and tried to do his best to build up the pieces he was left with, not necessarily the ones he wanted to be forced to use.

 

Think of the Steve Smith situation: Rivera was openly hoping Steve would be retained. It didn't happen. Steve lashed out at Rivera for not getting Gettleman to change his mind, but saved most of his ire for Gettleman. What collaboration there is, I don't think it's as mutual as might be imagined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument looks more ridiculous every week. You now have Mr. Scot even acknowledging that this isnt the case.

Your attempt to paint yourself as the "cool headed guy dishing out truths" is mute when it's such an obvious falsehood.

It takes more than 1 thing to lead to a team getting blown out week in and week out. There isn't a "simple truth" we can just paint over everyone of the team's flaws while we stick our fingers in our ears and sing dont go breaking my heart.

As I said yesterday, there is something wrong within the bedrock of the team that it is affecting every part, and it's going to take a new staff to clear that foundation. One poor position unit doesnt lead to a team not even looking like they desire to be out on the field on a weekly basis.

When Mr. Scot can agree it's time to clean house here, I think it's high time you do as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument looks more ridiculous every week. You now have Mr. Scot even acknowledging that this isnt the case.

Your attempt to paint yourself as the "cool headed guy dishing out truths" is mute when it's such an obvious falsehood.

It takes more than 1 thing to lead to a team getting blown out week in and week out. There isn't a "simple truth" we can just paint over everyone of the team's flaws while we stick our fingers in our ears and sing dont go breaking my heart.

As I said yesterday, there is something wrong within the bedrock of the team that it is affecting every part, and it's going to take a new staff to clear that foundation. One poor position unit doesnt lead to a team not even looking like they desire to be out on the field on a weekly basis.

When Mr. Scot can agree it's time to clean house here, I think it's high time you do as well.

Yes but we don't have "one" poor position unit....

We have a weak OL (which means no rush attack as well as the pass issues)

We have a weak WR corp

We have weak CBs

We have weak Ss

We have weak overall STs

So I agree with you....one weak position unit doesn't do that to team. But we don't have just one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we don't have money but this alone should tell DG why teams spend lots of money on FAs or trade picks for draft position or even sign average QBs to big deals.Talent is not that easy to come by in the NFL! Hope he learns his lesson this season and will not be cheap when we have the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we don't have "one" poor position unit....

We have a weak OL (which means no rush attack as well as the pass issues)

We have a weak WR corp

We have weak CBs

We have weak Ss

We have weak overall STs

So I agree with you....one weak position unit doesn't do that to team. But we don't have just one

 

We have had RIvera for four years now, that is unacceptable. A good coach should be able to anticipate areas of weakness before they even become that. Rivera seems to think any average joe can play any position. I'm even surprised he's been in the NFL that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully agree. 

 

Although I still want Shula to be fired.  Not because of any one thing he's done wrong but I've come to the same conclusion Zod had when we first hired Shula.  He's just not a good OC.  Never has been.

 

Even if we had all the talent in the world, I'd still want someone else.

 

I also wonder how the season would have played out had Hardy not been forced to sit out?  I can't help but see the domino effect.

 

No pass rush = no pressure = secondary sucking = offensive on field more = our O-line on the field more = Cam getting killed

 

It's all just been a giant run away snowball going downhill and it's still picking up speed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument looks more ridiculous every week. You now have Mr. Scot even acknowledging that this isnt the case.

Your attempt to paint yourself as the "cool headed guy dishing out truths" is mute when it's such an obvious falsehood.

It takes more than 1 thing to lead to a team getting blown out week in and week out. There isn't a "simple truth" we can just paint over everyone of the team's flaws while we stick our fingers in our ears and sing dont go breaking my heart.

As I said yesterday, there is something wrong within the bedrock of the team that it is affecting every part, and it's going to take a new staff to clear that foundation. One poor position unit doesnt lead to a team not even looking like they desire to be out on the field on a weekly basis.

When Mr. Scot can agree it's time to clean house here, I think it's high time you do as well.

 

I'm sorry, I'm supposed to take Mr. Scot's assessment as infallible truth? Did I miss that memo? I respect his opinion because like so precious few Huddlers he actually uses valid reasoning and good football sense to makes his points but that doesn't mean I have to agree or won't have counterpoints. (No offense to you, Mr. Scot.)

 

And I am not remotely saying their aren't myriad other issues going on, but it's near impossible to get a proper assessment of what to find fault with when such a fundamental aspect of the team is failing. Offensive line isn't as important as a quarterback, but it's damn close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Rivera lobbying for bad talent?

Or is he just giving PC coach talk with the slop around him. RR is a smart DC. Being that he knows crappy OL players....his job has always been to attack those weak players. I highly doubt RR thinks they are good.

I think he is a coach who talks up his players bc he thinks that is what he has to do IMO

 

He's not 'lobbying for bad talent'.

 

He doesn't know good talent from bad talent.  He thinks 'effort' guys are good enough.

 

Rivera has always talked up guys that 'did their best', and that was even before Gettleman got here.  Heck, this past offseason, Gettleman let go of some guys that Rivera had publicly praised (Sione Fua and Captain Munnerlyn, for example).

 

Likewise, look at his coaching hires.  GM's allow coaches to pick their staffs, so Mike Shula, Richard Rodgers and others are all Rivera.

 

Gettleman's mistake was giving Rivera any say in the roster at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I'm supposed to take Mr. Scot's assessment as infallible truth? Did I miss that memo? I respect his opinion because like so precious few Huddlers he actually uses valid reasoning and good football sense to makes his points but that doesn't mean I have to agree or won't have counterpoints. (No offense to you, Mr. Scot.)

And I am not remotely saying their aren't myriad other issues going on, but it's near impossible to get a proper assessment of what to find fault with when such a fundamental aspect of the team is failing. Offensive line isn't as important as a quarterback, but it's damn close.

I'm saying you're the last man standing and your continued quest to defend RonCo. at any cost needs to be evaluated. Don't be a Colin cowherd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, I think it's actually the opposite. I'm sure Rivera stands up for his guys and gives them good marks for effort but I don't think you would hear him openly lobby for better talent either. I think Rivera knew he was going into the season hamstrung and tried to do his best to build up the pieces he was left with, not necessarily the ones he wanted to be forced to use.

 

Think of the Steve Smith situation: Rivera was openly hoping Steve would be retained. It didn't happen. Steve lashed out at Rivera for not getting Gettleman to change his mind, but saved most of his ire for Gettleman. What collaboration there is, I don't think it's as mutual as might be imagined.

 

See above.

 

The problem with Rivera is that his talent evaluation skills are all but nonexistent.

 

Look at the guys he championed even before Gettleman got here.  Charles Godfrey's huge contract came in part because Rivera liked him so much.

 

You want further proof, look at his coaching choices.  The GM has no say in those.

 

A defensive coordinator doesn't need to know how to make good roster decisions.  A head coach does.

 

Rivera can't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we don't have "one" poor position unit....

We have a weak OL (which means no rush attack as well as the pass issues)

We have a weak WR corp

We have weak CBs

We have weak Ss

We have weak overall STs

So I agree with you....one weak position unit doesn't do that to team. But we don't have just one[/quote

Aside from the fact that our WR's and CB's have been a number of notches above weak most weeks, this argument falls under the weight of the notion that most of these players were given jobs by Ron, fought for by Ron, or were in charge of being developed by this guy named Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I'm supposed to take Mr. Scot's assessment as infallible truth? Did I miss that memo? I respect his opinion because like so precious few Huddlers he actually uses valid reasoning and good football sense to makes his points but that doesn't mean I have to agree or won't have counterpoints. (No offense to you, Mr. Scot.)

 

And I am not remotely saying their aren't myriad other issues going on, but it's near impossible to get a proper assessment of what to find fault with when such a fundamental aspect of the team is failing. Offensive line isn't as important as a quarterback, but it's damn close.

 

None taken. 

 

I don't ever expect anyone to just take my word for it.  I'm just another fan whose opinion is only as good as the weight you give it.

 

I believe what I believe and will defend it, but I can be wrong just like anyone else.

 

(see my record on first rounders over the past three years) :(

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Everyone knew the catch was secured and didn't move. That was clear to the entire audience. The only ones who thought it wasn't a catch were in the NYC home office. They knew they'd just offer an apology the next day.
    • NEVER FORGET!!!!   Canales was on no one's radar. Tepper couldn't get anyone to come here. He was all in on Ben Johnson. Nobody wants to work with Tepper, however Canales tenure may prove important for the next guy. This guy still has no idea what he's doing. 
    • The 4th down play was poor execution by Chuba. He didn't want to get physical like Rico and cut North South to lean on his blocks from Tremble and Ekwonu for half a yard. Also, the 3rd down play before that Bryce audibled out to a QB run and almost got the 1st down was on Chuba for not knowing the play call leading to poor execution. You can see Chuba's confusion when Bryce had to realign him. Then Chuba thought he was getting the handoff and was slow to develop his double team on the DE with Tremble. Then Chuba hesitated on pushing the block and just ran to the sideline making Bryce have to loop around him. This pulled the DE away from Tremble forcing Chuba to chip on the DE late and leaving the safety as a free defender. Chuba was suppose to double down on the DE to let Tremble peel off to the safety. This allows Bryce to set up his run to the inside or outside after the safety commits. You can also see Tremble walk over to talk to Chuba after the play and Chuba shrugs which tells me he didn't know what to do. The audible would have worked on 3rd and the dive would have worked on 4th. The plays were good calls and drawn up well. The question is why was Chuba unprepared for those plays in two critical back to back plays? I like Chuba as a 1st down RB and passing downs, but I have always seen him lacking the power and vision to be a short yardage power back. Chuba didn't come prepared for the Saints game or he was thrown into a position at the 3 spot that he was never prepared for.
×
×
  • Create New...