Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My projected 53 man roster is....


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

QB: Jake Delhomme, Matt Moore, Josh McCown

RB: DeAngelo Williams, Jonathan Stewart, Mike Goodson

FB: Brad Hoover, Tony Fiammetta

T: Jordan Gross, Jeff Otah, Jonathan Palmer

G: Travelle Wharton, Keydrick Vincent, Duke Robinson, Mackenzy Bernadeau

C: Ryan Kalil, Justin Geisinger

TE: Gary Barnidge, Jeff King, Dante Rosario

WR: Steve Smith, Muhsin Muhammad, Dwayne Jarrett, Kenny Moore, Ryne Robinson

DE: Julius Peppers, Charles Johnson, Everette Brown, Tyler Brayton, Hilee Taylor

DT: Damione Lewis, (player to be determined, it will be someone not currently a Panther), Marlon Favorite, Corvey Irvin

MLB: Jon Beason, Dan Connor, J Leman

OLB: Thomas Davis, Na'il Diggs, James Anderson, Landon Johnson

CB: Chris Gamble, Richard Marshall, Sherrod Martin, Captain Munnerlyn

S: Chris Harris, Charles Godfrey, Quinton Teal, Dante Wesley

K: John Kasay, Rhys Lloyd

P: Jason Baker

LS: J.J. Jansen

Notables that won't make it: Jason Carter, Larry Beavers, Geoff Schwartz, C.J. Wilson, Nate Salley, Nick Hayden

Some people I think that are in danger: Ryne Robinson over Larry Beavers, Quinton Teal over Nate Salley, Marlon Favorite over Nick Hayden

Everything else seems pretty cut and dry. What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could definitely live with that roster but as we are discussing in one of the other threads I would be ok with keeping only 4 receivers or 2 tightends and use the other roster spot for another DT yet to be determined. I just don't want to take a chance on another injury there. Then we could put Beavers on the practice squad or brock, the tight end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosario is definitely gone. I think they might Bring Fiammetta or Hoover in to motion from TE to FB or something. Rosario is talented, he can do a lot when he gets the ball in his hands, but he just doesn't have that sixth sense that tells him the ball is coming his way and that he should adjust his route... There's just not a lot of chemistry...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't where all the Ryne Robinson negativity is coming from but he will be the #3 receiver by week 6, if not sooner, bank on it.

Jarrett will have started his break out season by then. Ryne is not as fast as he once was, and he has problems catching passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rosario won't be cut. he has enough talent as a receiver to warrant some trade. if there is trade value there we use it.

using rosario's roster spot for a backup tackle....that would be a good idea just as long as DT is addressed first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson hasn't had a chance to return a single punt/kickoff yet. Both times he's been in on return duty they went out of bounds IIRC. He looked pretty comfortable on offense and could be a viable #4 option for us at WR. Still too early to tell on him, but if I was a betting man (I am) I'd bet he makes the team.

rosario won't be cut. he has enough talent as a receiver to warrant some trade. if there is trade value there we use it.

I was thinking he's definetly gone, not necessarily meaning he's cut. I would hope we include him in a trade for a DT if we can, allowing us to offer a lower draft pick than we would otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...