Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Failures


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

How important is coaching in the NFL?

 

Consider the following missteps made this season...

 

 

Failure to adjust to offensive line issues

 

A few seasons back, we faced a Vikings team that was known for its pass rush with a beat up offensive line and a quarterback that nobody feared as a run threat in Matt Moore.

 

What did the coaches do?

 

They moved Moore around a lot, adjusted the line schemes and went to quick, safe pass routes.

 

What's the MO been this season?  Long developing routes (using receivers that weren't suited to it), medium to deep drops with few if any rollouts and no discernible changes to the blocking scheme.

 

 

Failure to adjust to defensive line issues

 

Maybe if it had just been Greg Hardy we lost this season, the defense still could have been more effective.  But the reality is we lost both our top flight defensive ends, one to off field issues and the other to injuries that have hampered his performance.

 

Now, the Jim Johnson defensive scheme that we run is an extremely flexible attack.  Adjustments could have been made to use more blitzes, disguised blitzes, etc. and try and generate more pressure.

 

Instead, we're still trying to get pressure using just the front four, this despite the fact that Hardy's absence and Johnson's issues have us effectively down to a "front two".

 

 

Failure to properly use personnel

 

Go back to point one and you'll notice a mention that the receivers we've been using aren't suited to the routes we run.   Cotchery and Avant are both possession/red zone receivers, and have been effective when used in that role.  This coaching staff instead tried using them as deep threats and even on reverses, something their skill set didn't suit at all.

 

What makes that particular failure even worse?  We actually did have a speed receiver available to use in that role.  In fact, he showed in only the second week of the season what he was capable of.  yes, he had injuries, but even when he was healthy and available he remained buried on the depth chart while the coaches continued trying to force square pegs into round holes.

 

And what about the runningback position?  Anyone with working eyes can see Jonathan Stewart has been a far more effective runner.  And yes, he's been hurt too, but again even when healthy he's been stuck behind an ineffective DeAngelo Williams on the depth chart.  Plus there's the sheer comedy of watching Stewart get in games and look like he's finding a rhythm, only to see the coaches sit him down and stick Williams back in.

 

And I won;t even go into the position sifting adventures with Nate Chandler and Charles Godfrey (Oy).

 

But what about the quarterback?

 

Voth pointed out that Cam Newton was actually doing better as a passer before the staff "took the chains off", and he's right.  It does actually seem a little absurd now to think that you'd solve the problem of your quarterback taking too many hits by sending him on more runs, but that they did (while still staying away from rolling him out).

 

 

Failure to anticipate problems

 

Twice this season, we've seen massive special teams failures followed up by statements from the other team saying "we saw something on film".

 

Truth be told, it's probably happened way more frequently than that, but those are the examples we know of.

 

Coaches are supposed to self-scout to try and anticipate those things.  It hasn't happened, and even in the face of the failures that were so blatantly exposed, the head coach responds to a question of whether he still has faith in the special teams coach by saying "Why wouldn't I?"

 

 

Blaming the wrong people

 

And to top it all off, this season has seen its share of sacrificial lambs led to the slaughter.  Antoine Cason and Jason Avant are the latest examples.  Were their releases justified?  It could be argued, but what brings those arguments into question is the fact that they were misused.

 

Think of it this way: If you were this staff, you'd sign a shifty, elusive runningback like Darren Sproles and then use him as a blocking fullback.  He'd fail in that role, of course. Then you'd likely release him on the ratiionale that he wasn't playing well enough.

 

You'd also do things like throwing all the blame on the players for special teams failures even while coaches and players for other teams were pointing up things on film that your old college teammate failed to see.

 

And here we are...

 

 

The bottom line

 

I haven't even gone into gameday stuff like adjustments, clock management, etc.  Heck, that's a thread in itself.

 

No coaching staff is perfect, but the bottom line is that this coaching staff is deficient in far too many major areas to be effective anymore, and it starts at the top with the former "Riverboat" Ron Rivera.

 

They pretty much need to be shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How important is coaching in the NFL?

 

Consider the following missteps made this season...

 

 

Failure to adjust to offensive line issues

 

A few seasons back, we faced a Vikings team that was known for its pass rush with a beat up offensive line and a quarterback that nobody feared as a run threat in Matt Moore.

 

What did the coaches do?

 

They moved Moore around a lot, adjusted the line schemes and went to quick, safe pass routes.

 

What's the MO been this season?  Long developing routes (using receivers that weren't suited to it), medium to deep drops with few if any rollouts and no discernible changes to the blocking scheme.

 

 

Failure to adjust to defensive line issues

 

Maybe if it had just been Greg Hardy we lost this season, the defense still could have been more effective.  But the reality is we lost both our top flight defensive ends, one to off field issues and the other to injuries that have hampered his performance.

 

Now, the Jim Johnson defensive scheme that we run is an extremely flexible attack.  Adjustments could have been made to use more blitzes, disguised blitzes, etc. and try and generate more pressure.

 

Instead, we're still trying to get pressure using just the front four, this despite the fact that Hardy's absence and Johnson's issues have us effectively down to a "front two".

 

 

Failure to properly use personnel

 

Go back to point one and you'll notice a mention that the receivers we've been using aren't suited to the routes we run.   Cotchery and Avant are both possession/red zone receivers, and have been effective when used in that role.  This coaching staff instead tried using them as deep threats and even on reverses, something their skill set didn't suit at all.

 

What makes that particular failure even worse?  We actually did have a speed receiver available to use in that role.  In fact, he showed in only the second week of the season what he was capable of.  yes, he had injuries, but even when he was healthy and available he remained buried on the depth chart while the coaches continued trying to force square pegs into round holes.

 

And what about the runningback position?  Anyone with working eyes can see Jonathan Stewart has been a far more effective runner.  And yes, he's been hurt too, but again even when healthy he's been stuck behind an ineffective DeAngelo Williams on the depth chart.  Plus there's the sheer comedy of watching Stewart get in games and look like he's finding a rhythm, only to see the coaches sit him down and stick Williams back in.

 

And I won;t even go into the position sifting adventures with Nate Chandler and Charles Godfrey (Oy).

 

But what about the quarterback?

 

Voth pointed out that Cam Newton was actually doing better as a passer before the staff "took the chains off", and he's right.  It does actually seem a little absurd now to think that you'd solve the problem of your quarterback taking too many hits by sending him on more runs, but that they did (while still staying away from rolling him out).

 

 

Failure to anticipate problems

 

Twice this season, we've seen massive special teams failures followed up by statements from the other team saying "we saw something on film".

 

Truth be told, it's probably happened way more frequently than that, but those are the examples we know of.

 

Coaches are supposed to self-scout to try and anticipate those things.  It hasn't happened, and even in the face of the failures that were so blatantly exposed, the head coach responds to a question of whether he still has faith in the special teams coach by saying "Why wouldn't I?"

 

 

Blaming the wrong people

 

And to top it all off, this season has seen its share of sacrificial lambs led to the slaughter.  Antoine Cason and Jason Avant are the latest examples.  Were their releases justified?  It could be argued, but what brings those arguments into question is the fact that they were misused.

 

Think of it this way: If you were this staff, you'd sign a shifty, elusive runningback like Darren Sproles and then use him as a blocking fullback.  He'd fail in that role, of course. Then you'd likely release him on the ratiionale that he wasn't playing well enough.

 

You'd also do things like throwing all the blame on the players for special teams failures even while coaches and players for other teams were pointing up things on film that your old college teammate failed to see.

 

And here we are...

 

 

The bottom line

 

I haven't even gone into gameday stuff like adjustments, clock management, etc.  Heck, that's a thread in itself.

 

No coaching staff is perfect, but the bottom line is that this coaching staff is deficient in far too many major areas to be effective anymore, and it starts at the top with the former "Riverboat" Ron Rivera.

 

They pretty much need to be shown the door.

 

 

Good post! I agree. I can't see who anyone can justify this coaching staff. It is basic things that the coaching staff should be handling properly and they are falling short. It is like they go into a game with a specific game plan/scheme, no matter who is out there, no matter the score or opponent. If the scheme/game plan is not working, they will still stick with it. They refuse to make any kind of adjustments. I've see countless times where we find plays that are working and the staff would just revert back to the ineffective plays. It is frustrating as a fan because if I can see what is wrong with this team, why can't the so called professionals see it too. Frankly, I'm tired of watching my team lose. I won't give up on them but something has to change. How about bring in an OC that is a guru on offense? How about build around your franchise QB and continue to help him develop? I hope JR and Gman has seen enough because I know I have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was checking out Chris Brazzell II measureables, and I thought they looked suspiciously familiar. Turns out it was true, almost identical measureables to former Panthers DJ Chark circa 2023. I even checked Terrace Marshall Jr results, and honestly isn't that far behind them.   I know this isn't unique for just our team, but we seem to specifically have an obsession with trying to make this tall lanky speedsters work for us. I admittedly wasn't that high on Brazzell, and when I watched the tape I didn't really see that 4.3 speed, and a strong wind seems to tackle him.   I really liked most of the draft, including getting Hecht in the 5th when I graded him as a #1 Center in this draft. I'm rooting for the guy to work out, especially since our HC and OC made their bones as Wide Receiver coaches. But Brazzell is the only one I'm kinda meh on. I was hoping we'd trade up to get Big Citrus, or if we went WR I liked Ted Hurst much better. We'll see though. 3rd rounders seem to be coin-flips for us (see DJ Johnson/Matt Corral). But I'm rooting for the guy and for this experiment to finally pay off.   I haven't seen anyone else post something about this, so just thought it was interesting and passing it along.   #keeppounding   -------------------------------------------------------------- AI Overview   Chris Brazzell II and D.J. Chark both possess nearly identical elite deep-threat profiles, highlighted by their tall, lanky builds and blazing sub-4.40 speed. Chark was slightly faster, while Brazzell offers a marginally heavier frame and longer wingspan. [1, 2, 3, 4] The side-by-side physical and athletic testing results from their respective NFL Scouting Combines outline their comparable profiles: [1] Metric [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] D.J. Chark (2018) Chris Brazzell II (2026) Height 6'3" 6'4" Weight 199 lbs 198 lbs Wingspan 78.5" 80.1" 40-Yard Dash 4.34 seconds 4.37 seconds 10-Yard Split ~1.50s (est.) 1.52 seconds Vertical Jump 40.0" 40.0" (pre-draft) Hand Size 9.25" 9.0" Analytical Comparison Size & Build: Both receivers offer an excellent catch radius with lanky, outside-threat frames. Brazzell holds a slight edge in height and an even more significant advantage in wingspan, giving him a massive target radius. Speed Profile: Chark famously recorded the fastest 40-yard dash time at his combine, while Brazzell was a standout at his event. Both times are elite for their size, translating directly to the "field-stretching" and vertical playmaking abilities that define their games. Draft Status: Chark was selected by the Jacksonville Jaguars in the second round (61st overall) of the 2018 Draft. Brazzell was selected by the Carolina Panthers in the third round (83rd overall) of the 2026 NFL Draft.
    • I still reserve my right to bitch about how incompetent the Panthers are at running a football organization and point to the mountains of evidence in support.
×
×
  • Create New...