Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Changing my stance on fake bewbs


Jase

Recommended Posts

This is significant.  I used to be pro-natural only.  This has changed over time, due to a number of mitigating factors:

 

1.  Overall prevalence.  It seems 40% of women over the age of 25 has had some work done.

 

2. Quality of work.  Plastic surgery has come a long way.  To the point that it can be difficult to tell at times.

 

3. Restorative effect: Let's face it.  Time is not kind to the natural breast.  If a little tune-up can return glory to a once-proud breast, I'm all for it. 

 

4.  They're real if I can touch them.  Self explanatory.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never considered them "fake" at all.

I PREFER natural, but enhanced can be very very nice too.

If not fake, there is definitely a point where augmentation can cross into 'surreal' or perhaps 'parody' either because of size or poor quality. Tara Reid, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not fake, there is definitely a point where augmentation can cross into 'surreal' or perhaps 'parody' either because of size or poor quality. Tara Reid, for example.

 

Oh no question it can be over done.  It's all about proportion and unfortunately some ladies forget about that in the quest for bigger ones... 

 

Very similar to guys lifting weights and never doing leg day.

 

 

I figure a good rule of thumb is an increase of 2 cup sizes is plenty, more than that and it can start to get wonky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...