Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My last and final thought on the pre season...


adallastiger

Recommended Posts

The big question then, is how often does a team that's oh-fer in the preseason make up for it in regulation play. And the answer is: not often.

There were no 0-4 teams in preseason to make it to the conference championships or the Super Bowl in the past five years. BUT, if your team finds itself in that corner, you need not lose heart.

In 2000, the New York Giants went 0-4 (CHI 20 @ NYG 8, NYG 13 @ JAC 16, NYG 24 @ NYJ 27, BAL 24 @ NYG 17) in preseason, losing their fourth preseason game on Friday, Aug. 25 to the Baltimore Ravens.

They would meet the Ravens again on Jan. 28 in the Super Bowl as the NFC Champions, but they would lose again to them, 34-7.

Any of you who think that pre season is not an indication of the regular season, TO A DEGREE, are just nuts. Remember last year, before the season, I said to all of you that DeAngelo Williams was the best running back in the league? And 98 out of 100 of you said I was crazy? Well, now that you understand how right (or at the very least, at least being close to right) I was just know the following:

Look at the above stat. THESE AREN'T MEANINGLESS GAMES. THEY DON'T MEAN A LOT, BUT THEY AREN'T MEANINGLESS. Can the Panthers go 0-4 in the pre season, and win the super bowl? Yes, but don't bet on it.

NO TEAM TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE HAS EVER GONE 0-4 IN PRE SEASON AND WON A SUPER BOWL. In one way or the other, stats seem to say that if you can't win a pre season game, you aren't very good. Of course, you can distort stats the other way and go 4-0 by playing your best players against scrubs, and that will backfire also. Lions last year, blah, blah, blah.

If you think that the Panthers, going on history, can lose the next two games...and get to the Super Bowl...well, all I am saying is the odds are not good. These ARE NOT MEANINGLESS GAMES, AND SHOULD NOT BE TREATED LIKE THAT BY PLAYERS. IF EVERYONE WAS PLAYING AS HARD IN THESE GAMES AS U KNOW WHO...PANTHERS WOULD BE MUCH BETTER OFF..

Just sayin....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lions were 4-0 in preseason last year.

Jus sayin'

EDIT: Guess I should add more

It's also a nice thing to mention that preseason games are not really an impact on the regualr season, but you fail to see that.

Both Smith and Moose were out in the last game. Smith is out the rest of the preseason as well.

Our offense did good with out our pass game really active. And most of our defense did pretty good as well.

Folloing your logic of "PRESEASON MAKES OR BREAK THE REGULAR SEASON" The 2000 Giants Should've been horrible, and the Lions should've been Super Bowl Champs last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, at this point, I am not concerned with them getting to the SB...I just want them to be good. I want to watch them every Sunday and know they have a shot at winning and I want to believe that come the end of the season, there is still a chance they will be in the playoffs. SB would be nice but I would be more than happy with a competitive game EVERY Sunday.

So if they don't win any pre-season games, I'm not gonna freak out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't hurt your arm patting yourself on the back there Dallastiger. BTW.....why would anyone have a screen name w/ dallas in it on a Panthers board?
he's from dallas i think and he's a memphis tiger/dwill fan. not to be confused with a panthers fan.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...