Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why was Brady so crappy today?


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

It is like we are talkimg about Alex Smith

There's nothing wrong with managing the game.

Sometimes just being a game manager can win you the game and it did tonight.

Brady didn't try to be a hero. He didn't try to test Sherman, Chancellor, etc. He attacked the weak link of the secondary (Simon) and got the ball out quickly to the flat to negate Seattle's pass rush.

It was a good plan and because of it he's celebrating a Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady played fine, much like Cam's outing against this same team. People don't understand what good quarterbacking looks like when going against an elite defense.

 

all those words don't mean anything you're just a ball licker and that's all there is to it no matter what

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah.. i love that guy as he won a lot of games for us... but damn that play hurt us .... tonight that happened to the SeaChickens a bad bonehead play!! They will remember this .. that is the true fans will!

Oh, I am still salty as fukk about that godamn superbowl! Godamn Kasay.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing wrong with managing the game.

Sometimes just being a game manager can win you the game and it did tonight.

Brady didn't try to be a hero. He didn't try to test Sherman, Chancellor, etc. He attacked the weak link of the secondary (Simon) and got the ball out quickly to the flat to negate Seattle's pass rush.

It was a good plan and because of it he's celebrating a Super Bowl.

nothing wrong with a good game manger, like Chris Paul. Brady looked like poo and played a crappy game. i am ashamed of him. He is too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...