Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marvel and Sony Finally Agree - Spider-Man


CarolinaNCSU

Recommended Posts

Seems this just broke, Marvel tweeted it out a few minutes ago..

 

 

Sony Pictures Entertainment and Marvel Studios announced today that Sony is bringing Marvel into the amazing world of Spider-Man. 

 

Under the deal, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film from Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU). Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017, in a film that will be co-produced by Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel and Amy Pascal, who oversaw the franchise launch for the studio 13 years ago. Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger. Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films.



More on Marvel.com: http://marvel.com/news/movies/24062/sony_pictures_entertainment_brings_marvel_studios_into_the_amazing_world_of_spider-man#ixzz3RJWPPEib

 

 

So...IMO Spider-Man will make an appearance in a Marvel movie before Civil War. That leaves, Ant-Man as the only chance? Even if it's just an after credits scene, I would think they'd do it before the next Captain America. Or do they just throw him into the mix in a big role? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy poo can't believe they actually worked it out.

Latino review has an epic spoilery scoop about where Spidey may show up in the MCU. It was on their site a few weeks ago....I'll try and find it.

Edit: here it is...take it as the rumor that it is, but this could spoil lots of poo if it's true...which at least the Sony deal part was right

http://www.latino-review.com/news/marvelous-da7e-78-the-fates-of-cap-thor-and-spidey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interested to see how they can incorporate Spidey without it feeling rushed if, as it seems, the plan is to use him in Civil War. Apparently they're rebooting the character and re-casting. I could actually see them using Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker, though I'd personally be against that. Plenty of time to introduce Miles down the road and give viewers the original Spider-Man as part of the larger MCU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting that they're scrapping the ASM franchise and rebooting Spidey again. I'm not sure how they'll make it work having him appear in Civil War, TBH. If they're not doing the first MCU Spidey movie until after Cap 3 it's going to be tough to have him play more than a cameo role in Civil War.

 

What I'd do is skip over the origin story quickly since we've had 2 major movies in 12 years do it and everybody already knows the basics anyway. Like, have the post-credits scene after Age of Ultron be Peter Parker (early 20's aged) be bitten by the spider and at the start of Civil War have him be a new face on on the hero scene as Spider-Man and use him that way.

 

Then in the MCU Spidey film tell the origin briefly as flashbacks and start fresh following the events of Civil War.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this this morning and freaked out. It concerns me that Sony is still retaining "creative control" but I think theyre smart enough not to exert that too heavily at this point.

I am concerned at how this may force Marvel to scramble to change stuff. Civil War was already being written. Are they gonna stuff in Black Panther, Hawkeye, AND Spidey now? Or will he replace one of them? That makes sense within the scope of the story but may be a bit much in practice. It'll be nice to have all those stupid spinoffs Sony was going to do off-deck though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this this morning and freaked out. It concerns me that Sony is still retaining "creative control" but I think theyre smart enough not to exert that too heavily at this point.

I am concerned at how this may force Marvel to scramble to change stuff. Civil War was already being written. Are they gonna stuff in Black Panther, Hawkeye, AND Spidey now? Or will he replace one of them? That makes sense within the scope of the story but may be a bit much in practice. It'll be nice to have all those stupid spinoffs Sony was going to do off-deck though.

 

 

 

I think Sony is relenting creative control to Feige and Marvel Studios. Sony will have "final creative control", but I don't think Feige would have made the deal if he wouldn't ultimately have his vision put in place. Now that Spidey will be a part of Marvel Studios, everything he does from here on out will ultimately fit in to the larger "Marvel Cinematic Universe".

 

 

 

What's interesting is Avi Arad was not mentioned anywhere in the Marvel press release. Arad has been the lead guy for Spidey at Sony and he basically ruined Spiderman for them...so for that we should be thankful, because if Spidey wasn't such a disaster at Sony they wouldn't be making this deal with Marvel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, and granted it's not my original thoughts, but...

Spidey comes in during a post credits scene after Ant-Man or even Avengers 2. Then, he shows up in Civil War because duh.

This is followed by the Spidey stand-alone as the Avengers as we know them now are all elsewhere (dead, in space, their home planet, yada yada)...followed by Spider-Man leading a team of 'new' Avengers in the first battle with Thanos, followed by one helluva reunion to defeat him in Part II.

Avengers IV, featuring Spider-Man, Black Panther, Ant-Man, Dr. Strange, Ms. Marvel, as well as old friends like Thor, Ironman, Hulk, Captain America (Bucky?), the Inhumans, the Guardians, and whoever else wants to show up (Netflix series characters?). Getting all the actors to play nice money wise could be an issue, but it would hands down be the biggest box office hit of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
×
×
  • Create New...