Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

literally every name weve been linked to in a trade or signing over the last two seasons is available.


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Imo,another move happens,and it may be bigger and better than the Mo Williams deal.

Check hoops hype rumor page... Afflalo, Dragic, Reggie Jackson, just to name a few.

Regarding Dragic,apparently after telling the Suns that he would not be re-signing with them,he also submitted a list of 7 preferred destinations he would like to be traded to. Only three have been rumored - NYK, MIA, AND LAL. I have to wonder if we're one of the other four teams, considering he signed an offer sheet here two years ago IIRC.

EXCITING TIMES...

http://hoopshype.com/archive/rumors/2015/rumors-20150217.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was just trying to be bold, and it would be exciting to see us pull a trade for one of those big names and have Cho rob another team blind in the process, but at the same time, we already pulled off an incredible deal in acquiring Mo. It's entirely possible we do nothing.

Fwiw, Bonnell is saying that he's hearing Lance will more than likely still be a Hornet after the deadline and there isn't much movement going on for us.

But, I would just like to get something back for Lance, because he just won't work here.... Or who knows, maybe moving Neal will end up doing wonders for him if we keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk, the closer we get to the deadline, I have a feeling that the Brooklyn deal might pick up some steam. They have a player out in the media saying he wants him and Lance has already come out and expressed his desire to go there. It seems like they were the only team that really entertained the idea, so I'm hoping they revisit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk, the closer we get to the deadline, I have a feeling that the Brooklyn deal might pick up some steam. They have a player out in the media saying he wants him and Lance has already come out and expressed his desire to go there. It seems like they were the only team that really entertained the idea, so I'm hoping they revisit it.

 

At this point, I would suffer through the two years of Joe Johnson's deal if it means getting Lance off this team.

 

I believe the front office sees the target to become serious contenders as 2016, when the new TV deal cap is implemented and right around the time a certain point guard could be available. Until then, it's about the growth of a very young team and trying to get them some playoff experience as that offseason draws closer. To that end, they've supplemented the roster with veteran role players to help that young core of talent and try to keep the cohesion that made them a surprise last season.

 

Obviously they wanted to try and steal Lance from the Pacers because of his age and contract in hopes that he could grow with that young core, but he's been nothing but a detriment to the team. The roster has enough youth on it to "rent" Joe Johnson for the remainder of his contract without having to give up any major young pieces, and, by giving Billy King one of the few outs he has from the Nets cap hell, Cho could use that leverage to find another Troy Daniels (if the Nets had any young assets to begin with.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...