Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would Jeff Garcia be a good fit in Carolina?


RaidersFan456

Recommended Posts

Garcia is a WCO QB and would be a very bad fit here.

agreed here. he's a decent system QB. his age is showing and his body is getting beat up. he won't last a whole lot longer.

i do think that he actually gives the raiders the best chance at winning this year, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always liked Garcia, but I think the Panthers need to be looking long term at QB...I don't think QB is a position you want to have a couple of guys in their last seasons, one is OK, but not two. I'd probably prefer they spent a year on Marvin Harrison...at least he would have more of a chance of getting on the field and making an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed here. he's a decent system QB. his age is showing and his body is getting beat up. he won't last a whole lot longer.

i do think that he actually gives the raiders the best chance at winning this year, fwiw.

I thought the Raiders were a vertical attack team anyway. With all there speed at WR it would seem that way. Then again the change Coaches like every year so I could be wrong. Garcia dose not have the arm to be in any other system except WC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garcia is a WCO QB and would be a very bad fit here.

He has failed big time every time he has played in a system other than the WCO. Plus Testeverde can throw the ball longer than him.

Exactly.

Then again, if that's the case, why did the Raiders sign him? Hoping to go with an offense like in the days of Rich Gannon? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...