Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Line Ranked #22 in 2014 (Down from #7 in 2013)


MHS831

Recommended Posts

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/01/08/2014-pff-offensive-line-rankings/

(this article is a bit old, so if it has been discussed, I could not find it, I apologize to you and whatever God you worship, and please do not feel the tremendous obligation to read on)

 

22. Carolina Panthers (7th)

Pass Blocking Ranking: 27th, Run Blocking Ranking: 15th, Penalties Ranking: 3rd

Stud: While his work in pass protection was suspect, you have to appreciate the run blocking of Ryan Kalil that contributed to his +6.6 grade.

Dud: The move to left tackle was no easier for Byron Bell (-33.4) who continues to give up too much pressure.

Breakdown: All things considered, this could have been a lot worse. After losing studs Jordan Gross and Travelle Wharton to retirement and dealing with injuries during the season, they tried a number of different combinations with more success than you had any right to imagine. A bit of special praise here for the pickup of Andrew Norwell who has been something of a revelation.

 

Comments:  This is interesting because we should be able to see upgrades across the board.  When I see that we were ranked #7 in 2013, I am a bit shocked.  We had Bell at RT, Silatolu/Wharton at LG, Gross was on the decline of his career, and RG was by committee (Scott, Chandler, Bond).  Hats off to Matsko and to Cam Newton for freezing the defensive pressure.  In 2014, Cam was injured and defenses could pin their ears back.  

 

This year, the OL should be better in nearly every aspect.  Kalil is still rather solid-no longer elite, but he was flanked by 2 rookies for much of the season.  The two rookie Guards really stepped up in 2014, showing they belong.  Next season, I expect them to be more comfortable with the offense and more experienced.  Rookie linemen are often targets for the DL, so we endured in 2014.  Heck, Remmers was even a rookie in terms of experience.  He did OK in pass protection but was a liability in the run game.  I wonder if he would not be the same on the left side, where his body seems more suited to play.  Having said that, finding a RT is much easier than a LT.  I would still bring in a developmental LT (rookie, in other words) because Remmers would be an awesome backup OT. 

 

Having said all that, I expect both G positions to be upgrades in 2015 due to experience.  Kalil should continue to anchor, and we should see upgrades in talent at both Tackle spots--even if the best we can do is move Remmers to LT--still an upgrade.

 

There are other factors that will improve the OL play.   First, people do not realize how much Brockel helps us.  When he went down, we struggled more.  Secondly, Cam was dinged and the defenses knew it.  His run threat was not a concern.  Third, the upgrade at RB (Williams was 31 and played like it; Tolbert and Stew were hurt much of the season) will help.  In addition, another WR weapon will help Cam get rid of the ball sooner and keep Safeties out of the box. 

 

I would first like to take my hats off to coach Matsko for taking what we had and doing better than 9 other offensive lines.  In addition, for having the 7th OL last year with the issues we had at G and RT.  Amazing that the unit was ranked 7th.

 

I would also like to say that these are the reasons I expect, barring injury, that the OL will be one of the best in 2015.  It could be that we are 1 player away.

 

Just my perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. 1 player away and an injury free year is always the key. Which is why depth on the line is always important too. But I can only imagine us going up and could be just 1 guy away from doing very well. I do believe the team is on the cusp of turning the corner to a bright future for several years. Sustained success starts with the OL and DL (once you have a QB of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our o-line was better in 2013, but no way in hell was it 7th best in the league.  For some reason they gave us and absolute ridiculous run-blocking grade for 2013 that really inflated the overall score.

 

Anyone who watched us in 2013 knows we were nowhere near as good at run-blocking as PFF made us out to be.  They make out like we were godly at run-blocking that season.

 

And we DAMN sure weren't the overall 22nd best line the league this past season.  For about a 8-9 game stretch we had about one of the worst offensive lines I've ever seen.  Couldn't pass block at all, couldn't run block... the only thing they were even remotely good at was not getting penalized, but even then Byron still found a way.

 

Their o-line rankings are always very suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our o-line was better in 2013, but no way in hell was it 7th best in the league.  For some reason they gave us and absolute ridiculous run-blocking grade for 2013 that really inflated the overall score.

 

Anyone who watched us in 2013 knows we were nowhere near as good at run-blocking as PFF made us out to be.  They make out like we were godly at run-blocking that season.

 

And we DAMN sure weren't the overall 22nd best line the league this past season.  For about a 8-9 game stretch we had about one of the worst offensive lines I've ever seen.  Couldn't pass block at all, couldn't run block... the only thing they were even remotely good at was not getting penalized, but even then Byron still found a way.

 

Their o-line rankings are always very suspect.

In 2013, they had to get a lot of credit when Cam went on 30-yard scampers, when they were the reason he had to. 

 

I agree with you on both counts.  I do not know their history of rating OL play and I do not really have a knowledge of every other team, so I was not going to speak out about it.   However, the point here is--when we add a WR weapon, a solid blocking/h-back/fullback, upgrade at the RB position (which we did when Stew got healthy) and a T to a healthy Cam Newton, this offense will be significantly upgraded.  Heck, if we had the same OL this year and the same WR corps we would be better in 2015 simply because Cam would be healthy and the rookies (Norwell, Turner, Brown, and Benjamin) will be experienced. 

 

There is reason to feel optimistic about this offense in 2015.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One big reason our OL the last few years was ranked anything other than dead last is Cam Newton.

 

That OL last year would have gotten a number of quarterbacks IR'd for the season.

 

I think at times people don't realize just how awful Byron Bell really was. I mean yeah he was a nice guy, but good grief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2013, they had to get a lot of credit when Cam went on 30-yard scampers, when they were the reason he had to. 

 

I agree with you on both counts.  I do not know their history of rating OL play and I do not really have a knowledge of every other team, so I was not going to speak out about it.   However, the point here is--when we add a WR weapon, a solid blocking/h-back/fullback, upgrade at the RB position (which we did when Stew got healthy) and a T to a healthy Cam Newton, this offense will be significantly upgraded.  Heck, if we had the same OL this year and the same WR corps we would be better in 2015 simply because Cam would be healthy and the rookies (Norwell, Turner, Brown, and Benjamin) will be experienced. 

 

There is reason to feel optimistic about this offense in 2015.

 

 

Oh yeah, I agree.  The line definitely has potential to be good if we can find a solid tackle... as bad as it was last season, it did improve substantially once Trai got healthy, Norwell got the start, Kalil found some consistency, and we replaced Chandler with Remmers.  I'm just saying it was so bad for so long, I don't think it should be bumped up to 22 without having an asterik somewhere next to the ranking.  It was terrible for a whoooole lot longer than it was solid last season.  No way in hell there were 10 worse offensive lines than us last year.  I'm having flashbacks to the Eagles game just thinking about it.

 

But yeah, the 2013 ranking is a complete joke.  We honestly weren't even good at run-blocking that year, so I have no idea where they got that from unless they counted Cam's runs... which would be retarded on their part.  I saw Tolbert/Cam make something out of nothing and Deangelo get swallowed up in the backfield immediately after the snap too much to be naive enough to think that was good run-blocking.

 

I think they did something similar with 2012 too where the grade was inflated (another awful o-line year), but it seems like I remember them admitting they couldn't accurately grade it because Cam bailed them out so much.

 

I think their individual o-linemen grades are okay (still to be taken with a grain of salt though)... but somewhere along the line something gets lost in translation when they make their actual rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the Panthers have neglected drafting a LT to replace Gross or even brought in someone better. I have a hard time believing no one could have been drafted or brought in every year for the last 3-4 years.

I wonder why even our fans have been able call out players who suck before professionals finally realize it and let them go, often too late, hurting the team (Bell, Brown, Jarrett, Edwards, Fua etc.).

I wonder why other teams don't have this ineptness the Panthers have. Money can't be the reason for such a broad, long term issue.

Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...