Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Favorite (or Worst) Live Performance of Any Band?


Arroz con Panther

Recommended Posts

I was inspired by a thread on Reddit asking a similar question.  What is your favorite (or worst) live performance of any band?

 

I listen to some odd music, so mine probably won't be too well known, but I'm interested in what you guys have seen live.

 

Good Performances

 

In recent years, Flogging Molly, For Today and Eric Church (and I'm not a country music loving guy).

 

Aerosmith was my first concert, so they have to get an honorable mention.

 

Bad Performances

 

Toby Keith (because he was way too smashed) and I was highly disappointed by The Chariot.

 

So, what say you?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to the Slayer concert in Charlotte (The Fillmore). They had Suicidal Tendencies and Exodus play before them. It was excellent, but the best part was the amount of songs Slayer played. 21. The most I've really heard of them doing in a while.
 
Setlist:
World Painted Blood
Postmortem
Hate Worldwide
Die by the Sword
Chemical Warfare
War Ensemble
Mandatory Suicide
Necrophiliac
Spill the Blood
Hell Awaits
At Dawn They Sleep
Altar of Sacrifice
Jesus Saves
Disciple
Seasons in the Abyss
Snuff
Dead Skin Mask
Raining Blood
Psychopathy Red
South of Heaven
Angel of Death 
 
I can only imagine them in their younger days (1986 or so). I imagine the concerts were less "sane" back then, to say the least. Haha. It was my first concert, and I really enjoyed it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best...

1) AC/DC

2) Karikatura

3) Fiona Apple

4) Trans Siberian Orchestra

5) George Strait

Worst...

1) Drake

2) Maroon 5

3) Kendrick Lamar

4) Jason Aldean

5) Motley Crue

I live for music, it's my life. I co-own an audio company and as a result have gotten stage passes to a lot of shows. I've been to over 150 concerts covering pretty much any genre imaginable. I listen to everything and anything.

My list is based strictly on live performance and has nothing to do with my personal listening preferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add...

Taylor Swift is still my personal all-time favorite concert. Mostly because my girlfriend and her best friend fuged in my truck on the way home. Nearly 2 hours of chicks moaning, making out, fondling boobs and munching down on each other. They were so fuging wasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was inspired by a thread on Reddit asking a similar question. What is your favorite (or worst) live performance of any band?

I listen to some odd music, so mine probably won't be too well known, but I'm interested in what you guys have seen live.

Good Performances

In recent years, Flogging Molly, For Today and Eric Church (and I'm not a country music loving guy).

Aerosmith was my first concert, so they have to get an honorable mention.

Bad Performances

Toby Keith (because he was way too smashed) and I was highly disappointed by The Chariot.

So, what say you?

Eric Church is badass live!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been to ton of shows but so far

 

Best:

Mayer Hawthorne ( At the Orange Peel)

Bruce Springsteen

Michael Buble

 

Worst:

Bob Dylan( He played a show at UNCC and was terrible, but he is like 200 yrs old)

Gwar( It was seriously retarded)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best:

Mid-90s Marilyn Manson

Eric Clapton

Alice in Chains (original vocal)

Early 2000 Staind

Early 2000 Tool

Sevendust (don't even like this band)

Late 90s Metallica

Soundgarden

Cold

Gwar (not for the band)

Otep

Pantera

Worst:

Orgy

Shinedown

Eagles

Any country concert (Garth, Collin Ray, Vince Gill)

Incubus

Slipknot (like them, suck live)

Union Underground (like them, suck live)

The best concerts are ones with raw instruments and sound just like the album. That's true talent. Best bands for that was Old tool, old Staind, and soundgarden.

Can't wait for Carolina Rebellion I can finally see Korn and Slayer for the first time. I want to see how Manson does this old and Breaking Benjiman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst:

Orgy

Shinedown

Eagles

Any country concert (Garth, Collin Ray, Vince Gill)

Incubus

Slipknot (like them, suck live)

Union Underground (like them, suck live)

 

Some interesting bands here.  I'm surprised at Slipknot, Incubus and the Eagles.  Were they just boring or what?

 

 

The best concerts are ones with raw instruments and sound just like the album. That's true talent. 

 

Couldn't agree more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...