Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we go defense at 25, who do you like?


davos

  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. If our 1st pick ends up being for the D, who do you prefer?

    • Landon Collins SS
      26
    • Kevin Johnson CB
      6
    • Eric Kendricks I/OLB
      0
    • Alvin Dupree DE
      6
    • Arik Armstead DE/DT
      1
    • Malcolm Brown DT
      2
    • Danny Shelton DT
      2
    • Owamagbe Odighizuwa DE
      10
    • Shaq Thompson S/OLB
      10
    • Eli Harold OLB
      2
    • Jalen Collins
      1
    • Other (Specify)
      1


Recommended Posts

I think we bought ourselves a year to get by in the secondary with Tillman and Coleman, without having to draft someone high. I could see us grabbing an OLB or a pass rusher.

Why draft high when we can get Boston's and Benwikere's in the mid rounds. We dont need to eventually draft a DB high

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why draft high when we can get Boston's and Benwikere's in the mid rounds. We dont need to eventually draft a DB high

When I was younger, I always wanted skill position players in the first three rounds. My reasoning was that a team of athletes wins lots of games.

Then I went through my "Hog Molly's" phase. Where I wanted my lines taken care of.

Now? With the way our team is set up. I am all for BPA. With a lean towards big guys who are good athletes.

Other than Tackle, and maybe WR#2, we have solid starters all over the field. No matter who, or where, we pick, all the rookies are going to have to fight for playing time. This team is as close to be a complete team we may have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...