Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

X-Men: Apocalypse


Crixtala

Recommended Posts

Sooo... I'm admittedly a huge MCU fanboy.  What they've done has been nothing short of amazing with only a few movies being slightly less than satisfactory (looking at you IM3 and Thor2 and warily ahead to Ant-Man).  With that in mind... comics-wise, the X-Universe was always my bread and butter.  Being a child of the '90's, I loved everything related to the animated series and Wolverine with a passion and collected nearly every title that was X-related.

 

But, when it came to the movie universes, Fox's X-franchise and Sony's Spidey-verse were a far behind 2a and 2b, in my opinion.  Well... everything's changing there now.  The MCU is still the cream of the crop, but Fox absolutely hit a homerun with Days of Future Past and the Sony/Marvel collaboration announcement of a new Spidey changes a lot.

 

Fox is presumably setting themselves up with another homerun in the smaller, true-to-comics Deadpool that's coming up next... and I absolutely can't wait for it - but it already has it's own thread.  So, following that is the next installation in the X-Men series and the finale of the 'First Class' trilogy.  There's been lots of announcements lately from Bryan Singer in regards to casting... Sansa Stark will be Jean Grey, we'll finally get a real (Arch)angel courtesy of Ben Hardy... but today's announcement is a huge announcement in my opinion.  We're also getting a real Psylocke (Angel and Psylocke were always two of my favorite characters and favorite X-couple).

 

Bryan Singer         @BryanSinger Follow

Excited to welcome @oliviamunn as Betsy Braddock! #Psylocke #XmenApocalypse #XMEN https://instagram.com/p/1bYchvxD_p/

 

I simply CANNOT wait for this now... Olivia Munn will be a perfect Psylocke and finally brings a credible (more than previous incarnations, anyway) actress to the character, which means she'll finally get a real storyline.

 

THIS GUN BE GOOD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where me and you differ.... I love Psylocke for the same reason everyone does. And even though Olivia Munn is smoking hot I just don't think she is that good of an actor. We shall see.... 

 

Everything else I am super pumped. 

 

i may have been overly excited when saying she'll be a perfect Psylocke... i agree with you that Munn is not the greatest actress out there, but i'm incredibly excited to see them casting someone on this level because it at least confirms that she'll be a bigger role in the movie and hopefully movies going forward (like the potential X-Force film that has a script floating around - hopefully, with Deadpool... and Cable, and Domino, and...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they also casted Jubilee and Storm...I'm weary of tatum as Gambit. Never really liked Anna Paquin as rouge either but that's because I was introduced to rouge mainly through the 90s cartoon version which is so different than the film version they went with Anna Paquin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know next year we get Deadpool, apocalypse, and Gambit right?

And an X-Men tv series

 

yeah, I just didn't mention Gambit because i'm a little wary of that title... while I think adding Tatum is probably a good thing for the character and I actually like the actor he's turned into the past couple of years, I don't know how well that character will stand up in a standalone film.  i'm cautiously optimistic... it's such a good character, but we'll at least get to see him in Apocalypse first, so hopefully they'll lay the groundwork for an awesome character

 

and I haven't heard much on the show itself... we'll see what happens there.  a GenerationX show with Emma teaching young X-characters would be awesome

 

 

 

 

I hope Cable shows up at some point so he can be a part of the X-Force movie.  it wouldn't feel right without him, imo... but I saw a weird idea/rumor floated a couple of weeks back when Hugh Jackman tweeted that he was getting into the Wolverine character 'one more time' after insinuating he'd like to play it the rest of his life... that he could actually turn into Cable like in the Ultimate comics.

 

not sure that i'm for or against that idea, but Jackman basically built this franchise.  that would get rid of the Wolverine character that so many 'hardcore' fanboys hate and say take over all the films, introduce a 'new' character so many people are clamoring for and still keep Jackman employed in the X-movies.  plus, a lot of the films are already pulling a lot from the Ultimate comics and with DoFP opening the door for time travel, it wouldn't be a stretch to bring in the idea of alternate dimensions (especially with AoA basically happening now) where Wolverine could have eventually become Cable in another timeline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...