Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible Trade Scenario


Recommended Posts

If either of the top two RBs (Melvin Gordan & Todd Gurley) are on the board when Carolina is up, both teams following the Panthers pick have noted interest in the position.


This would put the Panthers in a strong position to trade back.

 

Possible trade partners could include:

 

Baltimore (26th pick)

 

Dallas (27th pick)

 

New England (32nd pick)

 

Jacksonville (36th pick)

 

St. Louis (41st pick)

 

Minnesota (45th pick)

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is going to give up their draft picks to move up 1 space.

 

A number of teams are in need of a quality running back.  The fact that both teams following our pick would likely select a RB makes our position more valuable.  These are possible trade partners for our spot. 

 

Baltimore: Has the 26th pick

 

Dallas: Has the 27th pick

 

New England: has the 32nd pick

 

Jacksonville: Has the 36th pick

 

St. Louis: has the 41st pick

 

Minnesota: Has the 45th pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is trading up at that point to get a RB? Cowboys jumping the Ravens to get their guy is the only scenario I see. It makes sense as a trade up spot to get a RB but I think it's fairly unlikely because I don't think there will be many teams looking to go up and get a RB at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already have 9 picks and a roster with what i would call good depth so i really have a hard time seeing 9 rookies + the undrafted ones making the roster. I'd rather see us trading up in one of the early rounds and grab a player that we really like.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...