Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look at players the Panthers might consider with 25th pick: Phillip Dorsett


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

David Newton article

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/13380/a-look-at-players-the-panthers-might-consider-with-25th-pick-phillip-dorsett

[

]Career highlights: Had only 36 catches in 2014, but 10 went for touchdowns and he had 871 yards -- an impressive 24.2 yards per catch. He averaged 22.8 yards on kickoff returns in 2013.

Why he would be a good pick for Carolina: When you talk about pure speed at wide receiver, few if any in this draft are faster. Dorsett ran the 40-yard dash in 4.33 seconds at the combine. No receiver was faster. He topped that with a 4.25 and 4.27 at Miami's pro day. He personifies the dynamic speed receiver the Panthers are looking to put opposite Kelvin Benjamin, Carolina's first round pick in 2013. He also could be an explosive kickoff returner. He's only 5-foot-9, but the Panthers had a pretty good run with a 5-9 receiver (Steve Smith) they selected in the third round of the 2001 draft. Some have Dorsett falling to the second round, but if there is a run on receivers this might be the time to pick him up if speed is what you want. [

]

Y'all already know how I feel, he's got the speed, and hands the FO has been talking about and doubles as a return man, so there's also versatility that the FO harps about.

I hope he's the pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I'm wary about is that if you watch Cooks last year, he really seemed to hit a wall adjusting to NFL speeds.  Dorsett seems a notch quicker in games though and doesn't shy away from contact like Cooks did in college.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone who has a largely speed based game has some hiccups transitioning to the NFL.  Everyone in the NFL has speed.  There are a lot of really good college players who simply don't have the necessary speed to make the jump to the NFL.

 

Those speed guys in college are accustomed to lining up across from their opponent week in and week out and simply being faster.  While that may still be true in the NFL, especially for a guy like Dorsett, the speed gap is quite a bit smaller than it was on Saturdays.  There aren't any 4.7 CBs in the NFL.  There are a lot in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id take him in the first his speed is elite and thats something we need. But after daves confrence I dont think we are going to get a wr rd one unless someone drops to us which is unlikely. But gettleman could of been setting up a smoke screen you never know but well find out tommrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you look at the guys we've visited with, there are a TON of high round WRs and OTs in the mix.  We've probably met with more 1st round prospects out of those two position groups than all other positions combined.  That doesn't guarantee we're taking an OT or WR at #25, but I think it's safe to say that both of those positions are heavily in play at #25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are these second to third round guys being mocked to us in the first? You can get Devin Smith in the second. Or Dorsett..

 

I guess you never really know where they'll go and WRs tend to get a media rise as draft time nears.  It happened last year with Davante, Matthews, and Latimer. I think a decent argument can be made for Agholor and Dorsett though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, Matthews and Latimer were both getting a lot of 1st round pick hype in the final weeks leading up to the draft last year.  In fact, by the time the draft rolled around, Matthews was the guy I wanted at #28.  Matthews had a very promising rookie season in Philly while Latimer was virtually non-existent in Denver last year.  Unless Latimer really steps it up this year, that "B" word is gonna start getting talked about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...