Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Signing 1st Overall Pick


Paintballr

Recommended Posts

Anyone remember when it was a big deal to strike a deal with the 1st overall pick BEFORE the draft even started? What happened to this? Has the new Rookie cap stopped this from being a big deal?

I remember Mario Williams signed, I think Russell did as well? Just wonder if Tampa knows they are picking Winston why not go ahead and start contract talks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the new CBA, there's not a big incentive like there used to be. With those $50 million+ contracts for someone who never played a snap in the NFL both parties had a long time to discuss the contract. Now there's a limit and that contractual dispute is out of the window. That's one reason IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessary with the new rookie wage scale.

 

I remember it used to be done. QBs drafted #1 would get bigger raises over last year's #1, then the next year, a DE or LT would go #1 and want more $$$ than the QB got last year. Caused lots of holdouts, and haven't seen those since the new rookie wage scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone remember when it was a big deal to strike a deal with the 1st overall pick BEFORE the draft even started? What happened to this? Has the new Rookie cap stopped this from being a big deal?

I remember Mario Williams signed, I think Russell did as well? Just wonder if Tampa knows they are picking Winston why not go ahead and start contract talks?

Though I agree with the rookie wage scale comments, who says they haven't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having the top pick gives team's leverage in case they arent happy enough with a player and can get extra picks and possibly more valuable players.

Just so happens that this year there are quite a few teams that covet both or one or the other of the QBs at the top and no team is just gonna give up their right to entertain talks concernkng that coveted pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...