Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Devin Smith still on the board


Rags

Recommended Posts

I think we want to, but I think he'll have to slide at least another 10-12 picks for him to be in range for what Gettleman would be willing to give up to move up.

I have us trading with the Giants at 40. Might need to slide more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have us trading with the Giants at 40. Might need to slide more though.

 

That would likely take our 2nd and 3rd rounders and Gettleman won't do that.  Honestly, it's probably around pick #50 where we can start watching for a potential trade up.  Our 2nd and 4th can get us in the ballpark there and I think that's about what Gettleman would be wiling to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm willing to bet my last pair of nipple shorts we'll trade up for him.

 

 

The Huddle 2015 Draft:

 

 

 

48. San Diego- Sammie Coats, WR, Auburn

49. Kansas City- Breshad Perriman, WR, UCF

50. Buffalo- Benardrick McKinney, OLB, Mississippi St

51. Houston- Devin Funchess, TE, Michigan

52. Philadelphia- Jake Fisher, OL, Oregon

53. Cincinnati- Preston Smith, DE, Mississippi St

54. Detroit- Ronald Darby, CB, FSU

55. Arizona- Byron Jones, CB, UConn

56. St. Louis (from Pittsburgh)- Garrett Grayson, QB, Colorado St

57. Carolina- Devin Smith, WR, OSU

58. Baltimore- Eli Harold, OLB, Virginia

59. Denver- Stephone Anthony, LB, Clemson

60. Dallas- Jay Ajayi, RB, Boise St

61. Indianapolis- Paul Dawson, ILB, TCU

62. Green Bay- Rashad Greene, WR FSU

63. Seattle- Phillip Dorsett, WR, Miami

64. New England- Henry Anderson, DE/ DT, Stanford

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yards a game works better over a longer period of time as well. Averages always work out over the long run. The smaller the sample size the easier it is to skew. Also opponents matter more when the size is small. Player 1 lights up 2 bad defenses in 4 starts vs Player 2 playing 10 games vs multiple defenses. It hard to make it apples to apples how it currently sits. Remember during Bryce’s little run last year how annoyed you were when people were pulling Bryce’s starts from week 9 on vs the whole season. 
    • Someone else claimed I said EVERY.  Literally in my post breaking it down it gave Bryce TDs per game.   Shough however has the majority in his favor if just looking at starts. whats subjective about comp %, yards, QB ratings and turnovers?  Now I guess the argument one might make off them could be subjective.  But all I’m saying is statistically as a starter he has been better this year overall.  I don’t think Shough is great.  I think he is impressive based on the situation.  2nd rounder stepping in on a bad team.   And he like so many other QBs…..serves as little red flag going off about what we are doing here offensively. 
    • Player A - 2 starts.  200 yards in each start. He averages 200 yards a game.  Player B - 1 start.  Throws for 400 yards.  Comes in another random game and has 1 pass attempt on a Hail Mary to end the game that goes incomplete.   Now given the random game he appeared for a snap, he averages 200 yards a game. Thats why you isolate starts. If you are talking starter vs someone who began as a backup.  Simple made up numbers/situations to illustrate the point. 
×
×
  • Create New...