Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game of Thrones - Differences in the show and the books so far


Bronn

Recommended Posts

Okay this thread stems from one of the other GOT threads. I don't want to get too spoilery here. If you want to spoil things, go to the book thread.

I would like to use this thread to point out any major plot deviations from the books to the show, in order to shine light on why book readers can be seemingly whiny about the changes at times. Also, there might be some show-only folks that are considering the books, or don't want to read them at all, and just want more info.

I'll try to update this as I think of differences, and encourage you all to do so as well.

To start with, I think the biggest changes are the omission of some characters. I won't say much about these characters other than who they are, in hopes that maybe the show will tackle them in the future.

Off the top of my head, you have Theon's uncles, Euron, Victarion, and Aeron. They all have roles that I feel like the show will get to next season, at least partially.

Other missing characters include: Arianne Martell (Doran's daughter), Coldhands (appears to be an intelligent wight, or something, riding an elk that runs into Bran and co. and assists them in getting to the cave), Lady Stoneheart (I am torn whether or not to say who/what she is due to the potential that the show breaks down and includes her), Strong Belwas (a guy that was helping Barristan in his journey to Dany, and who joined Dany's council after), Jeyne Poole (Sansa's childhood friend we saw in season one, but she has a bigger part in the books (namely acting as a fake Arya in Sansa's role this past season)), Willas and Garlan Tyrell (older brothers to Margaery and Loras), Val (Mance Rayder's wife and child bearer) and a slew of other players in the North and South, heads of smaller houses, etc.

Some characters have had different outcomes or roles on the show. The biggest of these were Robb's wife (still alive in the books, and some even think her family helped plan the Red Wedding, named Jeyne Westerling in the books), Sansa (playing the role of Fake Arya (Jeyne Poole) this past season), Bronn (kind of happy with Lollys in the books, it seems... he has taken on an advanced role in the show), Tyrion (hasn't met Dany face to face in the books), Barristan Selmy (still alive in the books), Stannis (still alive in the books (maybe in the show?)), Brienne (most of her stuff this season and last is brand new material), etc.

I'm sure I am forgetting a lot of stuff on the character differences front, but those are the first I notice.

For the most part, a lot of the plotting seems the same. Hardhome didn't really happen like it did on the show. Jon SENT Stannis' boats, and they came back with tales of terrible things, sicknesses, etc. and lost some ships on the way. Sam got sent away to Oldtown with Gilly, a swapped baby (Mance Rayder's child), and Maester Aemon (who dies on the boat trip) before the events of the finale. Wun Wun the giant causes a distraction at the wall by literally ripping apart a knight, which is when For The Watch happens in the books (everyone is lost in the chaos of what Wun Wun is doing)...

I will add more as I think of them... Remember not to get too spoilery...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loras Tyrell is a big change that bugs me. In the books he was so in love with Renly that he never took another lover. Show turned him into a slut who got over Renly real quick. Also, he was the 3rd son, not the heir, and joined the Kingsguard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree totally on Loras...

Another big difference I just thought of was the difference in the amount of prophecy. In the books, there is tons. It opens the door to a lot of the theories we always bring up.

Also, in the books, Arya and Jon have both had dreams where one could assume they are unknowingly warging into their dire wolves. Neither has explored it beyond having the few dreams, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loras Tyrell is a big change that bugs me. In the books he was so in love with Renly that he never took another lover. Show turned him into a slut who got over Renly real quick. Also, he was the 3rd son, not the heir, and joined the Kingsguard.

​I agree. It's one of the things I'm most disappointed with in the show. His line in the book about once the sun goes down no candle can replace it was a great line. They cheapened him and Renly and I can't figure out why. I feel like turning him into a slut didn't add anything great to the show besides implicating him for the high sparrow.

 

I also wish they didn't get rid of Garlan and Willis Tyrell, but I can understand why they didn't want to add too many characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started off with the show then went to the books... Then back to the show when I knew all the spoilers..( Joffrey, the fight between the mountain and the Red Vyper) . At the end of one of the books .. Someone that I'll keep a nameless female character is alive again or at least upright at a river. Along with the OP's posts about Theon's family. Can anyone shed any light ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that I definitely liked better in the show than the books was the ages of the kids.  I just got weirded out thinking about Tyrion marrying a 12 year old girl.  Not that 16 makes it a whole lot better...

Yeah not to mention Dany being 13 when Daario "took her in every way a man could take a woman."

I can think of a lot of ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...