Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Wegher beat out Reaves


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I'm assuming Stewart, Fozzy & CAP all make the 53 man roster (kind of a no brainer...), and I'm pretty confident Todman might make it too. 

I think Wegher will make the Practice Squad.

I've been thinking for awhile that Reaves might be a casualty as far as the roster.  Assuming no other team grabs him, will he still be eligible for the PS after camp now that we've waived him?

Is it unusual to carry 4 RBs?  Here's how I have the offense shaking out on the 53 man roster at the moment:

OffenseQB2
 TE3
 FB1
 RB4
 C2
 OG3
 OT5
 WR6

 

 

Off Total

26

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming Stewart, Fozzy & CAP all make the 53 man roster (kind of a no brainer...), and I'm pretty confident Todman might make it too. 

I think Wegher will make the Practice Squad.

I've been thinking for awhile that Reaves might be a casualty as far as the roster.  Assuming no other team grabs him, will he still be eligible for the PS after camp now that we've waived him?

Is it unusual to carry 4 RBs?  Here's how I have the offense shaking out on the 53 man roster at the moment:

OffenseQB2
 TE3
 FB1
 RB4
 C2
 OG3
 OT5
 WR6

 

 

Off Total

26

What was Reaves practice squad eligibility situation? I can never keep those rules straight.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Reaves practice squad eligibility situation? I can never keep those rules straight.

I've been thinking he is eligible.  He played only 6 games last year (his first year).  I'm not sure how many games he was on the active roster, but I *THINK* he had less than an accrued season [Update: it looks like Reaves was only active for the 6 games he played in, so that should mean he is eligible]

Here is a simplified version of the rules:

A player can be eligible if he does not have an accrued season in the NFL, although the NFL has now approved a maximum of two spots on the PS for players with no more than two accrued seasons. To have an accrued season, you have to be active for at least six regular-season games. A player can also go to the practice squad with an accrued season provided they were on the 45-man active roster for less than nine-regular season games.

from here: http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/8/29/6077941/nfl-practice-squad-rules-eligibility-salary-deadline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...