Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The "four or five guys" according to Strickland article on WRs


top dawg

Recommended Posts

In a way, I guess you could say that there is really little to be learned from Bryan Strickland's article about how Rivera views our group of receivers, but it does perhaps provide more clarity than most of us believe (or some of us want to admit).

That first group of "four of five guys" is comprised of Kelvin Benjamin – a 1,000-yard receiver as a rookie last season – veterans Ted Ginn, Jr., and Jerricho Cotchery, speedster Corey Brown and second-round rookie Devin Funchess.

Now some may believe that Cotchery is on the bubble, but I would say that his spot is as safe as those of KB, Funchess and Ginn.  The Panthers love his veteran presence both on and off the field. And it's not like he has in any way hurt his chances since camp started. I can almost feel the vibe of camp and Cotchery's security through my laptops's LCD. I can't say that about Brown who is probably the 5th guy in that group.  By making plays, Brown can assure that "four or five five guys" turns into just "five guys".  He has the best opportunity to take the "or" from Rivera's mouth in that equation, or he will be pushed back with the rest of the group that is squarely on the bubble.

Still not buying that Cotchery is in the top four?  Well, Rivera said that he is looking for consistency. He will be looking for consistency under the lights during the preseason games. 

"I'm looking for guys to make plays and take advantage of the opportunity," Rivera said. "Especially with the second and third groups, guys we put in position to make plays have to make plays."

Now if you are really being truthful to yourself, Cotchery is the most consistent wide receiver that we have (I said WR, not TE). He just is. He has really already proven himself in that department.  Ginn has been a pretty consistent WR as a Panther as well. KB is a beast, and you know our second round pick ain't going anywhere.  Consistency and making plays will be key to who makes the cut.  So while you're looking at these games during the next month, watch for consistency and play making to figure out who on that bubble is going to likely be our 5th and 6th receiver (and maybe 7th).  The receptions, route running and YAC will obviously be at a premium, but don't forget that plays can be made on special teams and while blocking as well.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thread should have been titled, "Article by Strickland on WRs reveals the 'Four or Five Guys'"

I know what you're doing, but mine is actually more accurate, as was my suggestion in the other thread. It has nothing to do with grammar, as was the suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brown is a UDFA making peanuts, but he is a potential solid contributor at #3, and possibly if he elevates his game even further, #2. He would need to have a spectacularly bad preseason for coaches to even begin considering the idea of cutting him. If they did, he would be scooped up very quickly. Which they obviously know.

Corey is not going anywhere. You're just going to have to get used to that man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brown is a UDFA making peanuts, but he is a potential solid contributor at #3, and possibly if he elevates his game even further, #2. He would need to have a spectacularly bad preseason for coaches to even begin considering the idea of cutting him. If they did, he would be scooped up very quickly. Which they obviously know.

Corey is not going anywhere. You're just going to have to get used to that man.

I don't think he is going anywhere provided that he shows up this preseason.  I still don't believe he is anyone's WR2.  If he is our WR2 at any point this season, then something would have gone very wrong at that time. Moreover, If I "hate" brown so much, I guess that other people "hate" Ginn, while even more "hate" J-Co.  Just as much as some think that Brown is a lock (which is possible), I am telling them that Cotchery and Ginn are even more locked into the 53 man roster. 

Lastly, both J-Co and Ginn are making veritable "peanuts" for what they are bringing to the table.  People are going to have to reconcile that both of these vets from a purely football and team needs standpoint are going to be here in 2015. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he is going anywhere provided that he shows up this preseason.  I still don't believe he is anyone's WR2.  If he is our WR2 at any point this season, then something would have gone very wrong at that time. Moreover, If I "hate" brown so much, I guess that other people "hate" Ginn, while even more "hate" J-Co.  Just as much as some think that Brown is a lock (which is possible), I am telling them that Cotchery and Ginn are even more locked into the 53 man roster. 

Lastly, both J-Co and Ginn are making veritable "peanuts" for what they are bringing to the table.  People are going to have to reconcile that both of these vets from a purely football and team needs standpoint are going to be here in 2015. 

 

For all the talk about how Ginn dropped passes for us in 2013, Jerricho was even less reliable in 2014, and even dropped a game winner in Cincinnati. I don't know if he's "on the bubble" or not, but I don't know that i would call him a lock either. Cotchery will likely only be around one more season anyway, so if it comes down to letting go of a promising younger WR, or Cotchery, I think you can figure out the outcome on your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much rather Ginn be the "veteran" guy on the team instead of Cotchery taking up a spot on the roster. We need YAC players to complement our two towers. I wouldn't be opposed to Benjamin/Funchess - Ginn/Brown and let Bersin/Byrd fight for the final spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all the talk about how Ginn dropped passes for us in 2013, Jerricho was even less reliable in 2014, and even dropped a game winner in Cincinnati. I don't know if he's "on the bubble" or not, but I don't know that i would call him a lock either. Cotchery will likely only be around one more season anyway, so if it comes down to letting go of a promising younger WR, or Cotchery, I think you can figure out the outcome on your own.

Cotchery had a drop. He can't catch them all. Since you are calling him "unreliable", do me a favor and tell me how many drops he had last year. Hint: I've already answered it.

As for Ginn, everyone knows that Gman, Rivera and Ginn weren't letting any dust settle under there feet to get him back in Charlotte. Not only is he likely the best (and perhaps viable) return man that we have, he has also upped his stock in camp as a legitimate WR3/4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cotchery had a drop. He can't catch them all. Since you are calling him "unreliable", do me a favor and tell me how many drops he had last year. Hint: I've already answered it.

As for Ginn, everyone knows that Gman, Rivera and Ginn weren't letting any dust settle under there feet to get him back in Charlotte. Not only is he likely the best (and perhaps viable) return man that we have, he has also upped his stock in camp as a legitimate WR3/4.

Yeah, and it just so happens to be the drop that cost us a .500 record.

He had 1 touchdown all year, down from 10 the year before. He was supposed to help us in the red zone.

It was a disappointing season for him. There is no way around that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...