Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smiths thoughts on returning punts..


dpanthersman

Recommended Posts

At first, Smith seemed open to the idea, saying, “I either can accept that role or refuse that role or take it as a compliment. I’m just taking every opportunity I get to matriculate the ball down the field and however that happens, that’s how it’s going to happen.”

He seems more open to doing it, or at least doing it because he realizes the team needs it. It is also refreshing to hear he didn’t want to return due to a cracked rib, and not simply because he had outgrown the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no thanks...too big of a risk.

At first, Smith seemed open to the idea, saying, “I either can accept that role or refuse that role or take it as a compliment. I’m just taking every opportunity I get to matriculate the ball down the field and however that happens, that’s how it’s going to happen.”

However, when reminded he hasn’t always wanted to return punts in the past, Smith said, “Well I cracked a rib a couple of years ago and that kind of make you think differently. I cracked a rib and separated it. For people who think maybe I’m getting too big for my britches and I don’t want to do it, a cracked and separated rib make you change your mind on a lot of things.”

btw...matriculate?

I do not think it means what you think it means.

inigo.jpg

oh...missed the hank stram reference. flew over my head. funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems more open to doing it, or at least doing it because he realizes the team needs it. It is also refreshing to hear he didn’t want to return due to a cracked rib, and not simply because he had outgrown the position.

Well, I'd be scared of injuries as a a returner too. I mean, you are often left in the open to be hit by numerous guys who are focused on you, whereas when you catch a pass, often times guys are out of place and have to regroup to take you down. Just think about kickoff returns... every single person is focused on you and they don't have to regroup at all. Ouch. :o

no thanks...too big of a risk.

Definitely. If he goes down... oh no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'd be scared of injuries as a a returner too. I mean, you are often left in the open to be hit by numerous guys who are focused on you, whereas when you catch a pass, often times guys are out of place and have to regroup to take you down. Just think about kickoff returns... every single person is focused on you and they don't have to regroup at all. Ouch. :o

Not only that but it's a bunch of special teamers trying to prove what they got.

The only way I'd be for Smith returning a punt is in a critical game situation or simply to psych out the other team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how bad our punt returners get, the risk of injury to Smith is way, way to big to warrant sending him out there.

Of course, if he goes to the coach and tells him to put him in (like against Seattle that time in the playoffs), you let him go and start working your way through the Rosary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...