Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*IF* both the Packers and Panthers stay undefeated until they play one another....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I can see GB going into Denver and taking its first loss, and only because of Denvers defense.  And even if they do lose that game I could still see it being flexed due to how well both teams have been playing even with the injuries.  Another revenge game imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-4 Eagles @ 2-5 Cowboys

7-0 Packers @ 7-0 Panthers

Yeah, who the hell wants to watch Rodgers & Newton, the 2 most exciting QBs in the league, slug it out in a match-up of unbeaten teams fighting for HFA when you can watch Bradford & Cassel disgrace the term QB in a match-up of sub .500 teams that are missing the playoffs. 

The NFC East media love affair is retarded. 

But the Cowgirls are "America's Team".....

 

Agree with your sentiment completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, WHEN we beat the Iggles in prime time and send Chip and Co back to Philly with their tails tucked between their legs, the media will start using the C word when referring to us.

Ive been waiting for that level of disrespect for awhile. Once they use the term Cinderella, if you think our boys are mad, you're gonna see another level once they start calling us that.

#DontBelieveMeJustWatch

#KeepPounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-4 Eagles @ 2-5 Cowboys

7-0 Packers @ 7-0 Panthers

Yeah, who the hell wants to watch Rodgers & Newton, the 2 most exciting QBs in the league, slug it out in a match-up of unbeaten teams fighting for HFA when you can watch Bradford & Cassel disgrace the term QB in a match-up of sub .500 teams that are missing the playoffs. 

The NFC East media love affair is retarded. 

Say what you will but the Dallas/Philly matchup will provide bigger ratings for NBC than a Green Bay/Carolina matchup would.  NBC doesn't care about records, they only care about ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see GB going into Denver and taking its first loss, and only because of Denvers defense.  And even if they do lose that game I could still see it being flexed due to how well both teams have been playing even with the injuries.  Another revenge game imo.

This game, one way or another, will give us a blueprint on playing Green Bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cowboys get the highest ratings nationally, but I think the Packers are Top 5. If the Eagles are struggling and the Cowboys still don't have Romo back, it's entirely possible we'll be flexed in.

 

3 straight home games in primetime following the epic Seattle game would be the best stretch in the history of this team...as long as we get more wins than losses in that stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...