Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Since when did you gain the ability to challenge a play to review it for a penalty?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

There was no challenge, good sir.

 

It was an auto replay from the booth since it was under 2:00 min. The penalty was not assessed on the play because it was ruled incomplete. Once that was overturned, the illegal touching for going out of bounds on your own was assessed. We just have bad WRs is all.

 

Ted Ginn gives them an INT and then Corey Brown fails to know where he is on the field of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm referring to Chip apparently bullying the refs into reviewing Corey Brown's incompletion for a penalty for stepping out of bounds and then being the first one to touch the ball. 

In all the history of replay, that has never been allowed, nor have I ever seen an official add a penalty after reviewing a play.  I've even seen plays that involved a fumble in which a player was viciously "facemasked" and the call wasn't made during the live play, so the refs couldn't add the penalty on upon review either. 

 

Tonight's refs have completely changed the game with their calls in favor of Philly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My fault, forgot it was under two mins so it's initiated by the officials themselves...   

 

But regardless, my point remains.  All they should've been reviewing was whether he stepped out or not and therefore whether it was a completion or not.   As far as I know, you cannot add on a penalty for an actual live ball play after review. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My fault, forgot it was under two mins so it's initiated by the officials themselves...   

 

But regardless, my point remains.  All they should've been reviewing was whether he stepped out or not and therefore whether it was a completion or not.   As far as I know, you cannot add on a penalty for an actual live ball play after review. 

You are incorrect. You can do it for that penalty, and you can even challenge for 12 men on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are incorrect. You can do it for that penalty, and you can even challenge for 12 men on the field.

Well then my apologies...   As long as replay has been back, I've always heard that you could not be penalized after review if it wasn't called live.  I may have seen the twelve men call before, but that's a dead ball penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

c'mon man.

 

If you're referring to making the thread PP, I was being completely sincere in my question.  Despite feeling very confident and knowledgeable in my understanding of the rules and replay, I did not know how they were able to add a penalty after review,so if someone was able to clarify then awesome...   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...