Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ginn's catch


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

There was nothing wrong with the call. It's the rule that needs to be changed. If in the referees' judgment the pass catcher is in the process of going to the ground in the act of making the catch he must maintain possession through contact with the ground. That didn't happen here. An odd rule (as it demands subjectivity), but that's the NFL world we live in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought when you have both hands on the ball and u hit the ground, you're down by contact if a defender touches you. 

 

Exhibit A:

panthers-eagles-48.jpg

I think it was just a "too close to call thing". I think that if the initial ruling was a catch, it would have stood. 

PS: I'm not sure his butt is on the ground yet in this photo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen anything like this and I have to say that was down by contact. I've seen plenty of players who's butts touched the ground first and they were down by contact. 

 

Martavius Bryants TD a couple of weeks ago when Landry threw him the ball. His Foot landed then his butt landed and they counted that as a TD. Basically the same principle. Except one was for a TD this time it was for a turnover. This has to be the worst turnover I've ever witnessed in my life. The refs are looking more and more like fools each week. There's Always something each week, players won't know what the rules are anymore, how can you expect them too if the refs themselves don't make up their minds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn left his feet to make the catch, therefore he must maintain possession as he goes to the ground.  The ball gets jarred loose as he hits the ground.  It is one of those calvin johnson type plays that is normally called an incompletion.  Only in this case it unfortunately landed in the lap of the eagle.

 

This is what happens when you have rules that state that you can have a post-possession incompletion.  The possibility of a post-possession interception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
    • The natural progression of ANY QB is to take more control of the offense.  Which is all Dave said. He doesn't have a narrative to push. He is says what is the natural thing to say in this situation whether it's Bryce, or any other QB.  THE THREAD TITLE ALONE TWISTS THE NARRATIVE.   so yes, many of you refuse to acknowledge anything other than your screwed perspective, for whatever reason, when it comes to Bryce.  Y'all have a great Easter. 
×
×
  • Create New...