Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andrew Luck- King of Garbage Time TDs

CamMoon

By CamMoon,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CamMoon Newbie

CamMoon

Posted
Posted

Didn't see this posted.

 

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/10/andrew-luck-garbage-time-touchdowns-stats-fantasy-percentage-of-tds-comparison-indianapolis-colts

 

On Sunday, with the Indianapolis Colts down 27-0 to the New Orleans Saints, Andrew Luck threw a touchdown and then another and then one more after that. What had been a terrible day (two interceptions and a shutout) was suddenly a decent one on the stat sheet. But while these passes seemingly got the Colts back into the game, they didn’t really. Indianapolis never had the ball with a chance to tie or take the lead after Luck began getting hot. These were purely garbage-time touchdowns, a practice at which Andrew Luck seems quite proficient.

If you look on Twitter, you’ll find a lot of people talking about Andrew Luck getting a lot of touchdown passes that don’t matter. Is this just a misguided reputation like when everyone said Tiki Barber fumbled too much years after he stopped doing so? Luck does have a lot of comebacks after all. Is it an undeserved insult? The anti-Luck patrol has been out in full force this year (a few had been waving red flags for years, others are only jumping on the bandwagon now that Luck is struggling.) This is a convenient talking point to explain away all those TDs.

 

 

 

Didn't feel like posting all of it but there is a nice little chart. Like a third of his TDs come in garbage time. He is Jay Cutler, if Jay Cutler had the worst neck beard in America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I struggle w/ certain definitions of "garbage" time.  It is like when Cam did a Superman celebration in a defeat.  Media claimed it was garbage time b/c it was a nice way to bash him.  Reality is....it was a game at that point.

Colts vs. Saints.  Colts were down less than a touchdown with 3 minutes left to play.  If they would have forced a punt on NO's last possession they would have had a chance to win the game.    So how is that a garbage time game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamMoon Newbie

CamMoon

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I struggle w/ certain definitions of "garbage" time.  It is like when Cam did a Superman celebration in a defeat.  Media claimed it was garbage time b/c it was a nice way to bash him.  Reality is....it was a game at that point.

Colts vs. Saints.  Colts were down less than a touchdown with 3 minutes left to play.  If they would have forced a punt on NO's last possession they would have had a chance to win the game.    So how is that a garbage time game?

The basis the article was going off of was the scores when the teams were up/down 3 touchdowns. In other words, 30& of Lucks TD cam when he was up/down 3 touchdowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

Cam has 9 td's and 7 ints with 4 rushing td's 

luck has 11 td's with 9 ints 

luck missed some time with injury, media is a joke for saying cam is playing a mvp type season but luck sucks I find it funny 

 

 

I don't agree that Luck "sucks" either. He's not making very good decisions passing the ball though.

Only comparing their basic numbers without looking deeper is fairly pointless.

Newton's interceptions are inflated a little due to inconsistency from our WR's.

Our QB has been carrying his offense with WR's who should be 3rd or 4th options. Luck on the other hand has T.Y. Hilton, and Andre Johnson as his #1, and #2. Both of whom would immediately start as #1 WR's on plenty of teams around the league, including ours. Which of our current top WR's do you think would currently start as #1's on any other team in the NFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
Posted

IMO the most accurate narrative of Andrew Luck is that he plays really, really poorly in games sometimes that causes his team to go into deep holes. He then somehow plays really well later in the game to get his team either out of those holes with a win, or really close to it. 

It's actually kind of perplexing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

IMO the most accurate narrative of Andrew Luck is that he plays really, really poorly in games sometimes that causes his team to go into deep holes. He then somehow plays really well later in the game to get his team either out of those holes with a win, or really close to it. 

It's actually kind of perplexing. 

Luck really has always had a tendency to start games poorly and play better as the game goes.  A lot of his comebacks over the years has been b/c he played poorly and dug his teams out.  He was more consistent in years past.  Luck IMO has always been better late in games than early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted

IMO the most accurate narrative of Andrew Luck is that he plays really, really poorly in games sometimes that causes his team to go into deep holes. He then somehow plays really well later in the game to get his team either out of those holes with a win, or really close to it. 

It's actually kind of perplexing. 

He's basically basically a better The Golden Calf of Bristol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

Cam has 9 td's and 7 ints with 4 rushing td's 

luck has 11 td's with 9 ints 

luck missed some time with injury, media is a joke for saying cam is playing a mvp type season but luck sucks I find it funny 

 

 

You compare them as if All of Cams were just bad throws.  How many of his Int's were receiver induced not bad throws.  I know of at least 3.

Luck has been an interception machine since he joined the league. 

Yeah he gets on a roll and brings his team back and wins a couple.  (Not that the AFC South is a dominate division)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PiratePanther189 Newbie

PiratePanther189

Posted
Posted

I struggle w/ certain definitions of "garbage" time.  It is like when Cam did a Superman celebration in a defeat.  Media claimed it was garbage time b/c it was a nice way to bash him.  Reality is....it was a game at that point.

Colts vs. Saints.  Colts were down less than a touchdown with 3 minutes left to play.  If they would have forced a punt on NO's last possession they would have had a chance to win the game.    So how is that a garbage time game?

I defend Cam 90% of the time, but that was so irresponsible and there was no defending that decision. He had thrown 3 bad picks I believe to that point, and contributed to that loss BIG time by just honestly overall playing like poo that night. That's ok, it happens to everyone.

He deserved some flack for that without a doubt. However, media put it on overkill no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...