Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's the best in the NFC?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

Well at least for the next 24 hours or so we're the #1 seed. I'm pretty sure we'll still be the #1 seed for another week after that, and hopefully after the Green Bay game as well.

Sorry.  That does not compute.  I do not know how to act if we get respect or not overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow night needs to be won.  Simply because we're better than Indy, it's MNF, and it's a huge opportunity for the division/playoffs/seeding with GB and ATL losing. 

 

Next week against GB will be fun, though.  After that offense was just embarrassed on national TV?  Yeah, our defense could have their hands full. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Tomorrow night needs to be won.  Simply because we're better than Indy, it's MNF, and it's a huge opportunity for the division/playoffs/seeding with GB and ATL losing. 

 

Next week against GB will be fun, though.  After that offense was just embarrassed on national TV?  Yeah, our defense could have their hands full. 

Yeah, we need to come out with laser-intensity focus next week.  Just hoping there isn't a letdown or flat start tomorrow for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Road to the NFC championship now runs thru Charlotte. This team is in direct control of their destiny. We handle business, everyone will be falling over themselves to make nice with us and we aren't gonna buy it. Too many doubters at the beginning.

Besides, the NFC is just gonna be spun as the team the Patriots will beat in the Super Bowl. The media's all on board Mr. Bundchen's sack for his revenge tour. Fug 'em

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah we're going to have to demolish Indy, which really isn't our style, to get the nod as best in the NFC.  Packers will still be considered the best.  They had a bad game against a good team....it happens.  Still can't believe how bad Green Bay looked though.  I thought for sure they were the team to beat in the NFC, but you can't lose like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I practically guarantee Panthers will not get the media's respect unless they completely destroy Indy.

I can see it now:

 

"Panthers barely squeeze by struggling Colts team. Packers still the team to beat."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...