Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jim Folsom (the guy that wrote Cam will be a bust) wrote another Cam article on a website that's much worse than Bleacher Report


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

http://sportszoa.com/nfl/cam-for-mvp-not-so-fast/

The Carolina Panthers ran their record to 6-0 with a win over the Philadelphia Eagles on Sunday Night. Many are talking quarterback Cam Newton up for the NFL’s MVP. If the MVP was truly an award for the most valuable player to a team, then yes, Newton is certainly that to the Panthers. And the Panthers might be the team that would nosedive the farthest if he went down. Although Dallas fans might argue with that right now.

But everyone knows the MVP goes to the best player, and that is Tom Brady. Nobody else other than Aaron Rodgers need apply. With Brady and Rodgers racking up touchdown passes by the bundle, two touchdown and three pick games are not going to get it done for Cam.

The fans are talking about how Cam doesn’t have a lot of talent around him. Yes, his receiving corps took a big hit when Benjamin went down in the preseason. But, I watch the Panthers and see a great team around him. That defense is about as good as there is in the league. Luke Kuechly is an absolute stud, he goes down for several weeks and they don’t miss a beat. The secondary is a pick six waiting to happen. And the Panthers run game is also pretty good.

Is Cam getting better? Absolutely. Is he one of the top five quarterbacks in the league? No. Sorry guys, he just isn’t. He’s not even the best in the NFC South. Drew Brees is still that guy.

But, that’s OK. Because what he is, is 6-0. And that is the ultimate measuring stick for a quarterback. You are what your record says you are and he is tied for first.

I'm just dead at this guy hating Cam this much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this:

The following are the combined opponent W/L of the Division leaders who have won at least 6 games (from toughest to weakest): 

Carolina (8-0) opponent W/L: 29-36 (44.6%) 
New England (8-0): 28-37 (43.1%) 
Denver (7-1): 28-38 (42.4%) 
Cincinnati (8-0): 26-40 (39.4%) 
Minnesota (6-2): 23-41 (35.9%) 
Arizona (6-2): 23-44 (34.3%) 

How stupid do you feel now that the proven facts have made a mockery of your lazy, weak-minded meme? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He saves his best (read: worst) for the comments section of his own stupid article when someone tells him to let go of the hate lol

Maybe you should let it go. The guy is not the MVP. Probably never will be. I’m not going to worship him now just because he barely escaped draft bust status and now is on a hot streak against a bunch of sub .500 teams. Whether I show up at the game depends on you and Bleacher Report. I’m sure not showing up there so one of you lunatics can take a shot at me without some security guards. There are too many nut jobs in your fan base. Who do you guys got this week? Wake Forest? BTW, the Eagles would be a lot better if The Golden Calf of Bristol was starting instead of that loser he beat in the championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...