Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question of the day? Re: women and tattoos


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think that tats take away from a woman's natural beauty. 

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I would never be with a woman who has any tattoos. Just not my style. I don't judge people if they have them and don't really care what they do I just wouldn't want to have a wife/girlfriend with tattoos.

A pin-up on a little hottie is a definite turn-on. If I had picks to back this up, I'll bet you'd change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Hahahahah. How ever did you know?! ;)

 

45 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Sorry to make everyone puke rainbows. I'll now chug a beer, scratch my ass, burp as loud as I can, and tell her to go make me a sammich. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UpstatePanther said:

Sorry to make everyone puke rainbows. I'll now chug a beer, scratch my ass, burp as loud as I can, and tell her to go make me a sammich. Lol

Perhaps appropriate sentiment if you are 22 years in like me,  but I wouldn't advise that quite yet. 

I only wish to give you a sincere "congrats" when you jump the broom.  No puking rainbows here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...