Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unheralded Architect of the Carolina Panthers


CPantherKing

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

No one can doubt that Hurney eventually painted himself into a corner when it came to the cap. We can all agree, however, that he did pick a great shade of paint to do it with.

 

Not even that. 

Hurney capped himself extending trash like James Anderson, Jake delhomme, and Charles Godfrey. 

Not exactly the best hills to die on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Clicheking said:

Thank you for the first rnd picks and that's it, he couldn't do anything right outside of that. Horrible contracts, hanging on to washed up players, missed on almost everything outside of the 1st rnd, trading future picks, I could keep going. Couldn't be happier we got a real gm.

Jerry needs to take some of the blame..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I never thought of Hurney as a football guru, I thought he was closer to a guy that threw poo against the wall and hope it stuck. You can just tell the way he used to answer questions vs. how Gettleman answers questions about personnel. Yes, he drafted Cam and Luke in round one. He also traded a first round pick for Everette Brown, and traded a second round pick to the Patriots for Armanti Edwards. He also gave up a lot to draft Jeff Otah who ended up being one of the softest players to suit up for the Panthers. He seriously considered giving up what would be the pick that got us Cam Newton to draft Jimmy Clausen's horrible ass. His dumb master plan to have two first round picks at running back that would have 1500 yards a piece and be a perennial contender never panned out. He drafted guys like Corvey Irvin in the third round. He would push mediocre players out on the field that would get outclassed constantly and people on this forum would talk about how he was a great draft builder because his picks were starting. Hurney had his moments of zen but he made too many mistakes, too many blunders to be successful in a hyper competitive league such as the NFL. I couldn't be happier that we got an actual GM that knows what a good football player is in Dave Gettleman. That's why guys like Short, Coleman, Benwikere, Ealy are starting now instead of guys like Richard Marshall, Charles Godfrey, Maake Kemoeatu and Tyler Brayton.

 

in short, he's not really an architect of anything. He's more like an unlicensed contractor that neglected a lot of important stuff like putting support beams in the necessary spots so that the first floor ceiling doesn't sag and got shitcanned for someone with real credentials 30% of the way through and way behind schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Not even that. 

Hurney capped himself extending trash like James Anderson, Jake delhomme, and Charles Godfrey. 

Not exactly the best hills to die on. 

I wouldn't call any of those guys trash, each did really well for a season or two, and one was great but let down by an injury in the end. I can't defend Anderson's and Godfrey's extensions at length, but both were retained based on the prior year's performance and some optimistic expectations. Both were also in positions where there was no clear cut follow on guys. Hurney didn't have Gettleman's talent for finding gems in the dustbin.

Delhomme's contract was greatly impacted by the fact that he had put off some of the pay raises he should have gotten early on for later. As he stayed, that big contract was looming, looming and then boom. The year that Jake was injured and had to have the surgery, he was playing as well as any QB in the league. At the time, he was earning it. After the surgery, he came back and did what he could and dragged us to the playoffs. Sadly, on his birthday, it all fell apart and he was never able to play again with any chance of being serviceable. The contract was already set in stone. One man benefited from it, a team suffered from it. Had they paid Delhomme better before, rather than leveraging his contracts against Peppers and others, his agent wouldn't have pushed so hard to make sure of the big guaranteed monies. They'd robbed Peter to pay Paul for too long and that's how we paid Delhomme millions to go keep the bench warm in Cleveland.

We rarely choose the hills we die on, at least consciously, but die we do. Every manager either eventually falls to the cap monster or falls to creating a losing franchise. Marty's hill just happened to be at the intersection of the two. There sure were some glorious moments along the way, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually I have always felt that using a qb to sneak was a huge mistake even for big guys. Do you remember when Cam sneaked the ball and got a helmet spear to the head and it wasn't even called. It is unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Everyone knows what you are going to do. Why not have a big guy or backup run the ball who is disposable? Yeah they know what is coming if you bring in a big guy. Like they don't if you keep the QB in...... Actually there are many more reasons not to sneak the ball with the qb versus using something else like New Orleans did who could still run or pass.
    • you want me to provide evidence of his jump balls? Or bailing the pocket?  I don't think either of those claims requires me to show you evidence.  What do you want evidence of exactly?  never did I mention downfield throws.  I said, he gets blind to play at the lines because of his size (the quick stuff).  There are literally plays I don't have time to search for but have been highlighted on QB school where there is just no way he can see the options on certain plays even if wide open (talking behind and around the line of scrimmage).   Line too close paired with the receiving  option too close.  And the stat I referenced (which you can find on next gen stats) was he is below average at and behind the line of scrimmage....which I'm sure his size/vision plays a role in the why. I have an agenda? Cool.  Then so do you.  and again, Bryce's cherry picked best play (which isn't how anything works).....still leaves him on the low end of production.  I'm not overly bashing Bryce.  I just acknowledge, most signs point to him having a low ceiling.  And in the big picture, that's not the direction you want to go.  He is our QB for now.  I hope he improves.  Which in turn would allow our O and others to develop.   But to me, there isn't much of an argument that Bryce Young is anything but short term solution.   
    • Again where is the evidence. You keep saying it but honestly you have shown no evidence. Unless you know what he was supposed to do and then what he did do, you don't know anything about his intentions and or forced changes due to height. His completion percentage for passes from 1 to 10 yards was only slightly lower than his best percentage which was 10 to 20 yards passing.  Not enough of a difference to be significantly different.  Truth is you have an agenda that you try to justify despite any evidence to the contrary. Many of us felt the same way but have allowed his actual play to inform our opinion. I still would have picked Stroud over Bryce but I am willing to keep an open mind and see what is there instead of filtering everything through my biases and already polarized opinions.
×
×
  • Create New...