Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vikings @ Cardinals TNF Thread


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

Let's go. Week 1 of my Fantasy Football Playoffs, and I'm not even checking if my opponent has any players in this game, simply because I want to watch this game clear of any obstructions. 

Despite any implications it poses to us, this game should be very watchable, unlike that Monday Night debauchery.

Go Vikes, just because I want to see the Cardinals exposed and dissected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In playoffs in both of my Fantasy leagues, 1 for each side of my family

 

not much action tonight accept fir i need John Brown to lay an egg

 

btw im not a fug who has 10 leagues and is bound to be in playoffs. I have only two. One is a $70 buy in.. Another just a $20. Money riding on this poo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My hatred for the Seahawks and confidence that we'll go 16-0 (or at very very least 15-1) has me rooting for the Cards since Seahawks fans would be so fuging annoying if they somehow end up winning that division, but my family is all form Minnesota and I'm cool with the Vikings and it would provide more cushion for us so I'm kind of split. That all being said I'm just hoping for some great football and a close, competitive game. Unfortunately I expect the Cards to run away with this one very early since the Vikings are missing their top 3 defensive players and another starter. Any Given Thursday(?) though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell yeah man. I have -one- league. A 12 team, keeper league with a 35$ buy in that I've been in with the same dudes for like 6 or 7 years. 

John Brown is tough because he can be non-existent for 50 minutes, and then out of nowhere, get like 14 points on one play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...