Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks bench will not see sunlight all game...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

The Minnesota Vikings made a strategic decision to claim the usual visitors bench as their own, solely for the extra sunlight it receives in the winter. 

Pretty shrewd move. 

Quote

The press box and club seating on the south end of the stadium creates a shadow over the south sideline late in the season for the Gophers, who occupy the south sideline during home games.

The shadow spills over to the field and eventually creeps over to the north sideline later in the game. This will create a more comfortable environment for the Vikings in their temporary home with the ability to stand in the sun longer during those cold home games late in the season. But the switch will likely disappoint season ticket holders that specifically wanted to sit behind the Vikings bench.

 

http://www.startribune.com/vikings-switching-sidelines-at-tcf-bank-stadium/264967131/

 

For the Seahawks, it might as well be a night game. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, blackcat said:

I believe they discovered there's a 20 degree difference between the benches during last years game against us.

Interesting if true.

I still don't understand why everyone is making a big deal about Seattle playing in the cold. Last I checked, Minnesota has to play in it too. There is no "used to" playing in sub-zero temperatures excuses for the Vikings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked about this in the other thread about it, this is going to make a huge difference.  IMO, they both will be playing on the field at the same time, but a 20 degree difference on the sideline will atleast affect reaction time of the players as they come onto the field for the first or second plays of a drive, considering how many drives there are in a game, that is a significant amount of affected reaction time.  Add to that, that these same vikings players played in the game against the Panthers last season, They are significantly more aware of what to actually expect tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NYPantherFan said:

Interesting if true.

I still don't understand why everyone is making a big deal about Seattle playing in the cold. Last I checked, Minnesota has to play in it too. There is no "used to" playing in sub-zero temperatures excuses for the Vikings.

I would think that the weather would favor teams that run the ball more.  A low scoring defensive battle would seem to be an advantage for Minnesota. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in starts, he has played better, been more efficient and outproduced Bryce by virtually every statistical metric that exists in 2025.  And has the 2 head to heads over Carolina.  I mean, your jaw should hit the floor.  But not for the reason you are implying.  That freaking stings.  Denying these realities isn't going to help the Panthers build a better team going forward.     
    • He is basically having a polar opposite rookie season than Bryce. 4-3 as a starter on a very bad team.  68% for 237 passing yards and 19 rush per game. 9 TDs,  6 TOs in his starts.  and folks acknowledge the surprisingly play because no one thought poo of the random 2nd rounder and he is player better as a rookie thus far than so many prized picks did as a rookies (not just Bryce but a boatload of dudes).   It's only a sour issue to give someone props because he is a Saint and of course the Bryce thing.  It's like giving the TE in Clev props for having near identical production as the chosen one Tyler Warren.  Fannin is having a great rookie season in a very bad spot. 
    • This is a very weird take. The reason Shough doesn't deserve it is because he's only started 7 games. He's doing crazy well for a rookie and out playing plenty of vets with a worse roster. He's waaay above league average in a number of categories during his starts and he passes the eye test in game by making plays. Meanwhile Bryce Young had one of the worst rookie seasons of all time. Still TMac deserves it more. It's only been 7 games for Shough so he doesn't deserve any awards. Even if he gets to 9 he doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...