Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens for some odd reason signed Trent Richardson


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Biscuit said:

This guy reminds me a little of Cedric Benson who parlayed a first round pedigree and mediocre production into a 7 year career. He does just enough to stick around.

Trent has literally done nothing. So I don't know what enough means.

 

feel bad for him because of the joke he's become because by all accounts he's a good dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson was actually a good signing by my secondary NFL team. Let me explain why.

Richardson has all the physical tools to be a good RB. His biggest problem is obviously his lack of vision in the line/hole. That can be easily fixed. This is stuff High School RBs learn. If he hits the film room with him not getting a ton of carries for his first few seasons. His body is still in good shape. The Ravens would not've sign him unless they believe he can be coached up. He could be a good steal for the Ravens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Crazydounut said:

Richardson was actually a good signing by my secondary NFL team. Let me explain why.

Richardson has all the physical tools to be a good RB. His biggest problem is obviously his lack of vision in the line/hole. That can be easily fixed. This is stuff High School RBs learn. If he hits the film room with him not getting a ton of carries for his first few seasons. His body is still in good shape. The Ravens would not've sign him unless they believe he can be coached up. He could be a good steal for the Ravens.

aabI8Yb5.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...