Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official NFL Free Agency Thread


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

I wonder if the Titans are willing to trade one of their receivers, I would love to get Kendall Wright 

 

Percy Harvin is still available, he's pretty much Ginn on steroids. It sucks Ozzy took Wallace and SD got Benjamin

Percy Harvin is a douche-canoe, never healthy, and a crappy teammate. He's not coming anywhere near Charlotte. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Saints actually tried to do it a second time the year they went after Byrd, but the plan failed.

Now they're in cap hell and we're laughing at them.

Well, except for the ones saying "Hey, why don't WE try that?"

nobody remembers the teams that do stuff like this and fail.  there were two alone last season in the colts and dolphins-roundly praised for all their splash signings and trades all for nothing.

this is nothing like the hurney years where our own players were vastly overpaid for no real reason outside of the fact that we drafted them and they were part of the "family".  do you think dave gettleman would have given charles godfrey 5 years and $28 million?  james anderson 5 years and $30.5?  probably not.  on the other hand, what do you think kurt coleman would be getting paid right now if every team got a do-over on 2015's free agency period?

the idea isn't that any and all participation in free agency is stupid and the panthers should just cocoon until the draft and do nothing otherwise.  carefully balancing cost with expectations  (aka looking for value) lands you a michael oher, a guy who indisputably played far above his salary.  his cap figure is $800k more than graham gano's for crying out loud and PFF ranked him in the top half of the league in pass blocking.  he was 15th which was better than russell okung whom denver will be paying $48 million with $20.5 guaranteed if they exercise his option going into 2017.  we had PFF's number two pass blocking line in 2015 and there is one player on it with a cap figure above $5 million and that's ryan kalil at $10.3 million.  both guards including a pro bowler count less than $1 million.  that's freaking awesome by any measure.  the clear weak link on the line is remmers and he's going to be challenged all throughout camp and the preseason by daryl williams.

the whole point of maintaining a cap cushion in the first place is so that you can retain your own players, at least in the general sense.  midseason signings and emergencies and all that play into it too to a lesser extent.  this wasn't necessarily a great strategy in the hurney era but with a great talent evaluator like gettleman building our rosters it's well worth it.  keeping the band together just to do it isn't the same thing as keeping the band together because it makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a plan to be in contention every year, not in ten years.

You do realize we went to the Super Bowl last year, right?

Good grief, you know nothing.

I remember losing the super bowl to a superior team. The same team who was in the super bowl a couple years ago and responded to their loss not by desperately holding the gang together and hoping it was a fluke but by ensuring that they were the best team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Growl's logic is to overspend in FA and build up a team for a one time rush at a SuperBowl. Sure, it's worked for the Broncos. It sure won't work out for them next year, however, while the Panthers are still growing and developing their core. They have not peaked yet, and what Gettlemen's doing is just all out magic. Keeping the core together to last a long time, and get repeat after repeat SuperBowls.

The Dolphins, Jags, Saints, etc. have employed that "one time Superbowl rush, overspend in FA" strategy, and for most of the time it didn't work out. Saints have won a SuperBowl, but you don't hear about them anymore, as they've regressed quite rapidly. Panthers are not going anywhere. If anything they're like the Patriots, they're built to last a long time.

Gonna be fun this season watching all the overspenders cave in *cough* Giants *cough* because of bad chemistry, and seeing the Broncos not even make it to the playoffs. Panthers have good chemistry, and a wel developing team. I'm done here.

Lol not at their peak? Well whose fault is that because they're certainly overdue. 

 

And honestly stop comparing us to new England . its embarrassing by itself given the contrast in success, but the mental gymnastics one has to go through to pull it off must be exhausting and is no doubt affecting the quality of your posts as a whole. We aren't built like new england, in fact, as I've stated in this very thread-im a huge advocate of actually striving to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

I remember losing the super bowl to a superior team. The same team who was in the super bowl a couple years ago and responded to their loss not by desperately holding the gang together and hoping it was a fluke but by ensuring that they were the best team. 

And what about the other teams that tried the same thing and failed? Like, for example, the Saints that you were so jealous of last offseason?

Lots of teams go all out for a single season, but the only thing it ever guarantees is years of suckage afterward. The Saints did it twice in recent years and failed both times, but you want us to be like them.

Seriously, just go be a Saints fan cause Gettleman isn't changing his approach. And at least over there you might find some agreement instead of everybody mocking you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what about the other teams that tried the same thing and failed? Like, for example, the Saints that you were so jealous of last offseason?

Lots of teams go all out for a single season, but the only thing it ever guarantees is years of suckage afterward. The Saints did it twice in recent years and failed both times, but you want us to be like them.

Seriously, just go be a Saints fan cause Gettleman isn't changing his approach. And at least over there you might find some agreement instead of everybody mocking you.

 

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what about the other teams that tried the same thing and failed? Like, for example, the Saints that you were so jealous of last offseason?

Lots of teams go all out for a single season, but the only thing it ever guarantees is years of suckage afterward. The Saints did it twice in recent years and failed both times, but you want us to be like them.

Seriously, just go be a Saints fan cause Gettleman isn't changing his approach. And at least over there you might find some agreement instead of everybody mocking you.

Lol don't look so wounded Scot, its unbecoming.

Your inability to decipher between calculated spending for quality players at areas of need (the likes of which cost us the super bowl) and the saints throwing millions at aged relics like champ baily and james laurinitis is, as I said last year, either willful ignorance so that you don't have to confront the reality of the discussion or a legitimate litmus of your inability to think critically as as a whole. 

 

So before we go on, answer that for me. Which one is it so I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

Lol don't look so wounded Scot, its unbecoming.

Your inability to decipher between calculated spending for quality players at areas of need (the likes of which cost us the super bowl) and the saints throwing millions at aged relics like champ baily and james laurinitis is, as I said last year, either willful ignorance so that you don't have to confront the reality of the discussion or a legitimate litmus of your inability to think critically as as a whole. 

So before we go on, answer that for me. Which one is it so I know?

Don't flatter yourself dude. You're not that important. Frankly, you're a laughingstock here. Heck, just look at the responses you're getting.

I suppose if you really wanted attention, you've got it. If it doesn't matter to you that the attention is multiple people calling you stupid, well that's your choice. Pathetic, but your choice.

You made some pretty ignorant comments last offseason too, but thankfully the Panthers front office is much smarter than you are. So the rest of us will be enjoying watching our team be a perennial contender while you sit back and stew that they didn't do it your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Growl said:

 

Lol don't look so wounded Scot, its unbecoming.

Your inability to decipher between calculated spending for quality players at areas of need (the likes of which cost us the super bowl) and the saints throwing millions at aged relics like champ baily and james laurinitis is, as I said last year, either willful ignorance so that you don't have to confront the reality of the discussion or a legitimate litmus of your inability to think critically as as a whole. 

 

So before we go on, answer that for me. Which one is it so I know?

Dude I get what you are saying. We can win a super bowl without mortgaging our future. That is the whole point.

a couple seasons ago you praised the saints and dolphins signings. They didn't do poo. It's not like you can just sign two marquee players and then whoooosh super bowl baby!!! The chances are still stacked against you. Is it not better knowing we can get it done with the talented pieces we have already then to try to buy up players and know that if this doesn't work we are fuged for seasons afterwards? This isn't some simple let's sign the two best free agents at their respective positions and then we win a superb owl. 

We still have young players who will be better next year. We got one of the most talented rosters in the league right now. I like our chances, as is, against any team in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We didn't lose the SB because of any extra money we didnt spend.or expensive player we didnt sign. We clearly had the best record during the season, so we were the elite team to beat. We lost because we didn't show up, fumbling the ball, time and time again, throwing picks and basically capitulating on offense. Denver came to play, they were prepared to do anything to win while we stood around feeling sorry for ourselves. We chose a bad day to have a bad day. On another day we may have won. Hopefully next time we come better prepared because we looked like a team that thought wed role to a win but we got smacked in the mouth. We were way more focused for Seattle and Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CelticCat said:

We didn't lose the SB because of any extra money we didnt spend.or expensive player we didnt sign. We clearly had the best record during the season, so we were the elite team to beat. We lost because we didn't show up, fumbling the ball, time and time again, throwing picks and basically capitulating on offense. Denver came to play, they were prepared to do anything to win while we stood around feeling sorry for ourselves. We chose a bad day to have a bad day. On another day we may have won. Hopefully next time we come better prepared because we looked like a team that thought wed role to a win but we got smacked in the mouth. We were way more focused for Seattle and Arizona. 

But I think the question is, is who do we lay that at the feet of? Was it on the players? On the coaches? I couldn't be the only one that thought we came out VERY lackluster, since we were being talked up the entire two weeks leading up to the bowl. I think a lot of fans were just so heart broken that they are grasping at straws for an explanation.

But anyway, any news on ANYONE visiting us? Haha, who am I kidding, of course there isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Scott Fowler from observer   An excerpt  from larger article gotta say, i am not sure what Canales or Young were  thinking in the final 2 mins  they both looked like they have never a 2 mon drill in their lives    Unprepared   Let’s just throw and hope was the strategy  Add to it,why leggett, the most unreliable receiver, was targeted so much during that drive is beyond me      With a chance to be unforgettable, Panthers’ final drive was one to forget BY SCOTT FOWLER [email protected] 4 hrs ago The Carolina Panthers lost again Sunday, 27-22 to Arizona, but let’s at least give them some credit for their heartbreaking creativity. This, at least, was not a rout like Week 1. Yes, the Panthers (0-2) did a whole lot of nothing through the beginning of the third quarter against Arizona (2-0), falling behind, 27-3. Then they did a whole lot of something, scoring 19 unanswered points under the direction of quarterback Bryce Young. Then the special teams recovered an onside kick by punter Sam Martin to, quite remarkably, get the ball back, down only 27-22 with 1:55 and 51 yards left to snag the win. And one timeout, too. After finishing three straight possessions with touchdowns, the Panthers would need to do it a fourth time to pull off what statistically would have been the largest comeback in franchise history. But while there was no quit in this team Sunday, there was no comeback either, and nothing but nonsense in that last “march,” which ended 46 yards away from the goal line. Let’s go through a little of that final drive for the Panthers, shall we? Young, who had played a horrible first quarter and then a terrific second half, reverted to first-quarter form. He was 0-for-6 on the drive. He only targeted Tetairoa McMillan, the rookie that is clearly the team’s best receiver, one time. When all else was failing, the option of throwing a jump ball to T-Mac — drafted No. 8 overall for exactly this sort of situation — should have been utilized. It wasn’t. Head coach Dave Canales suggested that the Cardinals started shifting their coverage toward McMillan. Said the rookie afterward to reporters when asked what the Cardinals did to limit him on the last drive: “I’m not too sure. It looked like regular defense to me. That last drive only lasted as long as it did because of three defensive penalties on Arizona, which kept Carolina in the game (defensive holding to negate what would have been a Young turnover; roughing the passer; offsides).   Now it is true that the Panthers’ offensive line was threadbare by then, with two starters out. This made the degree of difficulty harder for Young and everyone else. But the Cardinals defense was also banged up, as their defensive backs had been going down like dominoes. So how do you solve Arizona’s suddenly fearsome pass rush? Screens. Quick hitters. Chuba Hubbard in the flat. Maybe even a shovel pass to a tight end. There was plenty of time — what there wasn’t was plenty of yardage, nor enough flexibility from Canales. One of Young’s six incompletions was a pass to Xavier Legette, who to me at that point shouldn’t have been in the game. That pass went incomplete of course, because Legette — the Panthers’ first-round draft pick in 2024 — had what was undoubtedly the worst statistical lines in Carolina history. Young targeted Legette eight times. Eight! I have no idea why. Legette caught one. One! And it went for minus-2 yards, meaning Legette entered the game with 10 yards receiving this season and left it with eight. Now to be fair, Young (35-55-328 yards, with three TDs) had gotten Carolina back into the thing. Hunter Renfrow had a breakout game at slot receiver, scoring twice. McMillan didn’t score, but had his first 100-yard receiving game. Tight end Ja’Tavion Sanders and wide receiver Brycen Tremayne were also very good. And the comeback happened after Young about lost the game for the Panthers in the first quarter, fumbling the ball away on a strip-sack that led directly to a return touchdown and then throwing an ill-advised pass under pressure that resulted in a wounded-duck interception and three more points. Said Canales after the game about Young: “Sometimes it ain’t the worst thing, if you’re in that situation, to take a sack. I also know he makes some magical plays.” We saw both on Sunday. Young held the ball too long sometimes, including on Carolina’s final offensive play (a fourth-down sack). He also made some magic, sometimes throwing between three guys at once, sometimes escaping a sack attempt and keeping his eyes downfield for a touchdown. So there were some things that were better Sunday. Carolina only scored 10 points in Week 1; this time the Panthers had 22. The run defense improved. Young, after playing the first five quarters of the season as if he didn’t belong in the NFL, finally looked like he did again for those three consecutive TD marches. But that final drive?! Listen, Arizona was ripe to be beaten at that point. NFL onside kicks didn’t succeed about 94% of the time in 2024, yet this one did after a Cardinal misplayed it. Arizona had lost 19 points of its 24-point lead at that point. The Panthers, who had never successfully come back from more than 17 points down before, were close to a signature win for both Canales and Young. And then… total letdown. Again, let’s emphasize, the clock was very little factor. Carolina didn’t have 15 seconds left to score; the Panthers had 115 seconds left. And a timeout. And only 51 yards to navigate. Momentum was firmly on the Panthers’ side. These were the moments where Drew Brees killed the Panthers, time and again, when he played for New Orleans. Three-step drops. Eight yards here. Twelve yards there. Right down the field. But for the Panthers, every play looked the same — Young on a deep drop. Scanning, scanning. The pocket breaking down. Then, either a heave, or some scurrying around and then a heave. Or a sack. All the blitz-killing plays that the Panthers have at their disposal — they didn’t run any of them, it seemed like, except a Hubbard run that netted 3 yards. The Panthers’ best plays were Arizona penalties. Other than that, it all went south. Carolina couldn’t adjust to the Arizona adjustments. Needing a touchdown, the Panthers never got closer than the Arizona 33. And so that was that.   At least there was some hope. At least the game was exciting in the final two minutes. But, as has happened so often in the past eight seasons, when it was winning time for Carolina, it turned into losing time.
    • Ditching XL is addition by subtraction. I 100% believe Thielen would tell him where to line up  every snap and explain his route. Through 2 games he has shown 0 comprehension of the play book. I’m not absolving Young at all but XL is  supposed to be his second read, but dude runs the wrong routes and gets boxed out by guys who are 4” shorter.  At least Coker has shown aptitude to be a real NFL receiver. 
    • I'm trying to be as pragmatic and as un reactionary as possible. And once again multiple things can be true  His draft last year was disastrously terrible. X looks like an absolute bust. Brooks hasn't played. Wallace looks like a miss. But demani needs more pt, cws is solid and Coker has shown promise This draft cannot be judged after 2 games esp with a dc who doesn't want to play them. But tmac looks legit. Princely has promise. The rest is a ?  Has he made mistakes? Undoubtedly.  Is the roster better than it was 2 years ago? I'd say yes. I'd say our biggest problems are still the ones we had 2 years ago - Bryce and evero.  And as I've said before, at least he hasn't traded any future picks. Yet.  So IMHO Morgan is a mixed bag but not a total bust. Yet.
×
×
  • Create New...