Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafttek's full 7 round draft


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Another needs based mock.

when are they gonna learn/care?

Not necessarily.   BPA could fall out that way.   Decker, Washington & Xavien Howard could very well be the best players available in rounds 1 - 3.

Also, it's hard for these computer database sites like Drafttek to do anything but a needs based draft.  They plug in the team's needs and assign each a priority and then use that algorithm to figure out who each team drafts.

Yeah, Gettleman will have his surprises because of how he evaluates players and who he has as best on his board.  But these mock drafts can at least give some idea of who might be available at different positions when we pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Not necessarily.   BPA could fall out that way.   Decker, Washington & Xavien Howard could very well be the best players available in rounds 1 - 3.

Also, it's hard for these computer database sites like Drafttek to do anything but a needs based draft.  They plug in the team's needs and assign each a priority and then use that algorithm to figure out who each team drafts.

Yeah, Gettleman will have his surprises because of how he evaluates players and who he has as best on his board.  But these mock drafts can at least give some idea of who might be available at different positions when we pick.

Indeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KB_fan said:

Not necessarily.   BPA could fall out that way.   Decker, Washington & Xavien Howard could very well be the best players available in rounds 1 - 3.

Also, it's hard for these computer database sites like Drafttek to do anything but a needs based draft.  They plug in the team's needs and assign each a priority and then use that algorithm to figure out who each team drafts.

Yeah, Gettleman will have his surprises because of how he evaluates players and who he has as best on his board.  But these mock drafts can at least give some idea of who might be available at different positions when we pick.

Agreed that it could shake out that way.  It's still just another cookie cutter mock.

Fun to look at I suppose but can't be taken seriously as the variables alone make them irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

Another needs based mock.

when are they gonna learn/care?

I wrote for Drafttek one year (covered the Panthers).  They make you switch your picks to keep it refreshing.  You then have to defend the choice in a narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I wrote for Drafttek one year (covered the Panthers).  They make you switch your picks to keep it refreshing.  You then have to defend the choice in a narrative.

Again that's fine, this mock is easily defended because these are perceived as needs.

imho, mocks made before the free agent period has matured is a bit silly.  Our FO fills the roster prior to the draft as best as possible to prevent drafting based on needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

I'm so damn glad all of these mock drafts won't be anywhere near what Gman will do....just like every year where people mock the shittiest drafts for us.

 

This has less to do with needs and more to do with ensuring your mock has the biggest names going to the most popular teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan personally.  Highly doubt we take an OT in the first, the 2nd round pick is solid, Howard is vastly overrated, no way we wait until the 4th to take a DE and for the love of God, no more App St guys.  I also don't believe we're taking a RB in this years draft, that will be a priority next off-season/draft.  And finally, no way Burbridge falls to the 7th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Again that's fine, this mock is easily defended because these are perceived as needs.

imho, mocks made before the free agent period has matured is a bit silly.  Our FO fills the roster prior to the draft as best as possible to prevent drafting based on needs.

L-Town, I just want to make sure that you don't think I was mocking your post---I was simple explaining the process so people understand it.  I opened it at peeked at the players.   I wish Draftek would explain the theme/rules they were using (they may now, but didn't then).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...