Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BJ Raji


firefox1234

Recommended Posts

Panthers have "some interest" in former Packers DT BJ Raji according to ESPN

 

Would love if Gman picked him up, i know he is typically a 3-4 DT but imagine him and Short paired together! Also a good stop gap safety net if the Panthers arent able to keep both Star and Short.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We need a guy that will do a dance on the D-line after a sack. I'm in.

0.5 sacks in the last 4 years combined(missed all of 2014 with injury so 3 seasons total). I wouldn't get your hopes up for much dancing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

0.5 sacks in the last 4 years combined(missed all of 2014 with injury so 3 seasons total). I wouldn't get your hopes up for much dancing.

I didn't say he would be the one doing the actual sacking...just the shaking and baking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

So you're saying he should come on the cheap?

That's not really his game. Raji, Soliai, and Love all fit the 1-tech mold in a 4-3, so they'd be expected to be the second-unit Star where they're mainly run-stuffers. He's not gonna break the bank, but I'm not sure I can see Gettleman paying him what he wants either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just wondering about possible draft implications. I'm also wondering what it means in reference to Coples playing for us. Does this squash that dream, or does it mean that they are actually considering Coples at DE (and not DT, as some suspected)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...