Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons I cant trust Pitbulls


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin Greene said:

This is 100% true.

However when a pekingese goes off you shake it off your pant leg. When a pit bull goes off, people die.

My aunt has a maltese that I swear is the meanest little poo alive, but it weighs 2 pounds, if it tries to bite you, you can punt it across the yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

I grew up with this story..(who didn't in my generation..) 

51KwALpjeBL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Didn't realize they were pit bulls when I was young. So I've always had an affection for pits, and I do believe owners are the problem not the breed. 

@Kevin Greene what about a wild pack of pekingese?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy is watching my GSD for me for awhile so I can find a house and all. He has a pit. 

Let's just say my German has pretty much took over the house in a dominant fashion. Pinning it to the ground when it gets out of line. 

Just saying....pits aren't the most badass of the breeds by any stretch. Pits are wonderful dogs if you don't punch them in the face constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...