Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best Positions to Target in Each Round


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Yea that was interesting but very incomplete. For example it only addresses DL in terms of looking for depth. What if you're looking for a starter?  Does picking one in the second or third offer significantly less value than the first compared to other positions?  My eyeball test says there's more of a dropoff from first round DL to mid to late round ones than a lot of other positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find stuff like this very interesting and I've read a few similar articles in the past couple years exploring the same idea in addition to things like SPARQ scores and Force Players which filters out players based on their overall athletic ability and thus their likelihood to succeed in the NFL.. However, I can't imagine Gettleman even paying the slightest amount of attention to any of it. He's too old school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 15 said:

And what about Tight Ends, did I miss that one?

TE was the worst position to draft I believe. Data suggests you'd probably be better off addressing it in FA like we did with Olsen and the Pats just did adding Bennett and just recently Clay Harbor too. Guys like Gronk and Eifert have elite traits. I dont see anyone like that in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He really impressed last night. Accurate. Lightning release and throws a ball that 100% passes the eye test. He drastically upped his draft stock showing out like he did on the biggest stage in college football. 
    • I am not at all up for under 6' myself. That list is small and unimpressive, I really can't think of anyone but Wilson in that category recently I would call good that I can think of. Murray could have made it work but he is incredibly dense IMO. That's just bad odds. Over 6'? Shouldn't be an issue by itself.  100% on the second part. That's what matters first and would dictate an exception.   
    • I’m pretty sure he isn’t referring to outliers. Lamar is the most athletic QB in history, Top 1% athleticism. I get his point, about the ideal QB being 6’3 or taller.  Kind of funny how billion dollar QB needy organizations refuse to look at QB’s they just don’t like. Org’s rather flounder than be flexible. Lamar, Shedur….etc  Both QB’s we could make the argument we could have had.  Shedur would have been a distraction to finally see if Bryce was worth the draft spot (and Bryce emphatically isn’t) but we would have a low capital investment for 2026. Allowing us to invest resources in the defense (Sonny Styles etc..) 
×
×
  • Create New...