Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dean Marlowe, Trenton Robinson, Colin Jones, & Marcus Ball


davos

Recommended Posts

Those are our current safeties outside of Coleman and Boston.  Last year, we used (3) Harper, Coleman, and Boston for the bulk of our defensive snaps.  We had some nice looks with Coleman at SS and Boston at FS in the playoffs and at parts during the season.  Kurt is a strong type to have capable of playing either spot (as he's shown).  So, with Harper gone, is this going to primarily be a two man crew with Coleman at SS and Boston at FS, or could you see one of the other guys beginning to contribute on defensive snaps as a SS? 

-Dean Marlowe is a guy we got as a UDFA and was a surprise player that made our 53 last season.  Only played in like 4 games but has been mentioned here and there to have a good amount of upside and seems to obviously impressed our staff to make the 53 as a UDFA and still be here.  A 'yout at 23. 

-Trenton Robinson is that smaller safety we signed early this offseason; very little has been mentioned about him and I honestly forgot we signed him haha.  He was the captain of Michigan State as their FS with Kirk Cousins.  Has played both spots in the NFL, only 26.  He did grade poorly last season as a SS in DC but wasn't playing behind a front like ours. 

-Colin Jones has filler experience in our nickle packages, strong ST player and very fast.  He's been solid depth to have. 

-Marcus Ball...he's there somewhere.  Has dreads and knows how to rile up OBJ. 

-Oh...and Travell Dixon...he's a name listed on the roster page. 

 

Just to note: There's virtually no UFA safeties worth a damn.  Maybe Bacarri Rambo but not much outside of ex-Falcons/Lions types so let's refrain from "sign blah blah" talk.  Yes, bla blah had two good seasons back in the early 2000s and is probably better off on his beet farm in Arkansas.  

So how do you see this rolling out?  Anyone with decent info (Zod?) have any word on what we may look at package wise? 

 

-Onion Knight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't we pick up more safeties? So these are our back ups? Marlowe and Jones are fine. The other two I'm not sure about. If Boston or Coleman go down though.  :/ not looking good. This area is concerning. Marlowe doesn't have enough experience along with ball and Robinson. Jones does but he's hit or miss on the field. This is concerning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Didn't we pick up more safeties? So these are our back ups? Marlowe and Jones are fine. The other two I'm not sure about. If Boston or Coleman go down though.  :/ not looking good. This area is concerning. Marlowe doesn't have enough experience along with ball and Robinson. Jones does but he's hit or miss on the field. This is concerning. 

I'm in agreement.  Outside the offensive trenches, safety is the spot I'm slightly worried both depth and role wise.  If Boston becomes a full time starting FS then sweet but I think that's the better position for both him and Coleman (Though Coleman is good at SS as well per last year; just would like a guy better in run support/more consistent) 

The thing is though with our front 7, maybe a stout SS against the run isn't as important? I dunno but the depth/expected roles is very interesting at safety.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmashNDash said:

They seemed to see a lot in Marlowe, I wouldn't be surprised to see him be that third, heavy rotation guy.   Also, I can see us picking up a vet during cuts in August.

Yeah once cuts roll along that's another story.  The market right now/for camp however is light so I'd like to hope someone steps up.

Who knows, maybe there will be a little Marlowe train coming to the boards this summer.  I find this as interesting as the battle for the 4th/5th receiver spots.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that our depth at safety seems a bit thin.... but hoping Boston & Marlowe ball out.  Only problem is that as I understand it Coleman, Boston & Marlowe are all most naturally suited for FS.  Not sure how hard it would be for one to transition to SS??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Agree that our depth at safety seems a bit thin.... but hoping Boston & Marlowe ball out.  Only problem is that as I understand it Coleman, Boston & Marlowe are all most naturally suited for FS.  Not sure how hard it would be for one to transition to SS??

Coleman played a lot of snaps at SS last year.  Kurt and Boston have both been considered tweeners capable of both.  I guess the question is maybe transitioning to a full-time SS spot since they seem more suited for FS if you had to choose.  Good at keeping the play in front of them, acting as a center fielder, and ballhawking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Marlowe...Love his upside.  He'll "tag your fanny"

Many people (along with myself) aren't too comfty with the thought of Boston starting.

Maybe with another NFL offseason of conditioning & training he'll be ready to step up. He's much faster and better in coverage than Harper...  if he can get his run support up, we should be ok. That's not even taking into consideration upfront pressure. 

Depth is a concern but Marlowe should shine if the opportunity is there. What scares me is the idea of possibly 2 rookie corners starting(if bene is not ready) infront of the said safety combo.

 A wise man once said, "Sometimes the answer is already on the roster"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ShutDwn said:

Someone enlighten me on how Tre is such an untrustable player.

 

Not hyperbole like "he missed a tackle", give me proof that when he plays the defense isn't the same. 

I can't speak for anyone else, but for me, I like Boston as a rotational guy.  As a starting calibre safety that we are to rely on for 16 games as Coleman's partner-in-crime, I'm hesitant.  That's not to say Boston can't be 'that guy', but as of now, he hasn't been consistent enough for me.  IMO, he's somewhere between Godfrey and Mitchell.  Not as bad as Godfrey's bad times, but not as consistently good as Mitchell's.  

I too think we add a vet that gets let go this summer.  Nothing appeals to me on the FA market currently, but I could see a camp casualty or two that DG goes after. I think he would prefer another vet presence on that backend to help the youngsters in front of them.

Marlowe is a guy I'd like to see more of and could be talented enough to stick, but haven't seen enough of him yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Canales comes back and Bryce doesn’t I would probably prefer to bring in 3 guys he likes from around the league or maybe outside a top ten pick and work through them, give that a shot. Because if we win a few more games we won’t be in the running for the top rated QB prospects anyway. 
    • You mean tepper but yeah I agree about rhule   Baker is a top 3 potential qb that is play for mvp and he is doing it with a slew of injuries
    • There’s too many to reply to so I’ll just say a couple more things then I’m out: 1. It hasn’t been both ways and that’s the point. People saying stuff like “too bad Bryce Young didn’t make that tackle” is a direct result of the ridiculousness of blaming Bryce Young for literally everything. I remember one game day thread a poster unironically blamed Bryce Young for JT Sanders flipping onto his own neck and injuring himself. That post was pied. I literally just read a post blaming Bryce Young for XL dropping a ball on a would-be game winning drive last year. This past week, when Tmac bounced a ball off his hands for an interception, Bryce Young was immediately blamed in the game day thread. Alternatively, people who try to give credit to Bryce Young are immediately told that to credit Bryce Young is taking away credit from Rico Dowdle, OL, whoever, and that they shouldn’t be talking positively about Bryce Young because he doesn’t deserve any credit. 2. Yes, there have always been bad posters, the difference is that back then they were largely derided. Bryce Young’s rookie season, when many of us were simply pointing at the train wreck of the whole team and saying it was maybe a little tough to evaluate Bryce Young when he had no time to throw and slow receivers, and just saying basic stuff like “Bryce Young can physically throw the ball further than 20 yards.” There was an attempt made to limit all those opinions to a single thread, by a mod. This is like saying lunatics running the asylum is normal because there have always been lunatics in the asylum. The difference is before they were patients, now they’re in charge. 3. I know for a fact I am labeled as one of the “Bryce Stans” by many of the usual suspects, but the fact of the matter is they have no idea what my position is on Bryce Young because any attempts at nuanced discussion in the past have been so completely pointless due to never being able to get past the hyperbole. How can we have a serious conversation if you insist he is physically incapable of throwing a football 20 yards? Or if you insist that he somehow duped the Panthers into drafting him just by drinking water? Or if you insist that he should be able to succeed behind one of the worst offensive lines I’ve ever seen (rookie year, not now). And I’m not the only one, there are many who have left the huddle because of it and started a discord server, I’m just too lazy for another app.
×
×
  • Create New...