Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sources: KD be staying in OKC for two years and poo with an opt out after one


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I don't see why he'll leave after ever they done this postseason. OKC has a very talented roster. 

Only way I can see him leave is to SA or GSW. 

If I'm KD, I'm taking that 2yr opt after yr 1 deal. 

They need a SG. I'd like to see OKC try to move Ibaka/Kanter for one; probably Ibaka.

They should definitely trade Ibaka, he looks washed up somehow. They never should have matched Kanter honestly, they're going to hvae to pay Steven Adams really soon. 

Interesting decision they have on Waiters too. If I had to guess what they'd do I think they'll resign Waiters and play it back next year, they've been relying on natural progression for several years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be lame.  In my opinion, that would be taking a HUGE chance that the Celtics could put together a team better than the Thunder.  That's a silly bet to take, considering you was just ONE game from the finals.

If he bails on the Thunder, I'd probably just start to hate him, I couldn't imagine losing a player like that as a Hornets fan.   It's not like the Thunder is fielding bad teams every year out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

Give it a rest. 

Boston's best player is a 5'9 point guard. Heck, talent-wise a healthy Hornets team is better than the Celtics.

You think Durant is really going to pass up playing with Westbrook to go to Boston?

Their best chance at acquiring a bonafide star would be via the trade market, but fewer and fewer teams are wanting to take on their underwhelming draft spots, forcing them to build a roster of nice, but ultimately limited young players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get the Boston hate...to me, any FA would be VERY smart to head to Boston. Brad Stevens just took a team with one borderline All-Star, no shooting, and mostly trash and castoff players to the playoffs. KD, Isiah, another FA, plus the young guys/draft picks they currently have...in the East? They're immediately the 2 seed at worst for the next couple years. Take the 3rd pick as the centerpiece of a deal and turn it into Boogie Cousins or Jahlil Okafor and go to battle. 

 

They wouldn't have to be "better" than the Thunder necessarily...they'd be in the East where Lebron/the Cavs could easily take a step back in the next couple of years and waltz to the Finals a few years in a row. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, JJman Returns said:

I don't see why OKC is acting like this is a down year. They gave one of the best teams in NBA history a battle better then one we've seen in the NBA in a long time. Durabt needs to keep building with Westbrook and all their talented big men and let the FO add more pieces and they could be holding up a trophy next year.

It is just the sting of how they lost and essentially having the series in their hands at home down the stratch in Game 6.  If they had been down 3-1, come back and then lost Game 7 then they would be looking at it differently.  It will feel better the further away they get from the loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

100% Durant is a Celtic 

Durant says he's going to be "a little selfish" in process, if you listened to the interview the writing is on the wall he is leaving OKC 

Reliable Bruce Stearns from WEEI: 

"I have this on pretty good authority. The Celtics have sat with his agent and other representatives of Durant. The Celtics do know — I don’t know who it is — but they do know who he would prefer to be brought here in a LeBron-Chris BoshDwyane Wade-like way. Because that’s how it works in the NBA. You need to know who the guy or guys that that guy wants, which would be a factor.

Now, I don’t know if Durant’s told them that. But the Celtics know. They know. They’ve been told what group of guys he would want to come here."

Who in the fug is Bruce Stearns?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...