Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Buckle up, Buckaroos


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Is it fixed for you now?

Quite a bit better, yes.

I still honestly prefer the pane on the right.  I feel like I have to keep my head turned to to the right now to read the posts.  They go so far to the right of my screen / vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

That's the point. :) 

The eye naturally goes from left to right. So this should bring more attention to the articles we work on. 

whoops, i made a thread about this in all-pro before reading this. i'm personally of the opinion that it feels very unnatural beginning a line in the middle of the page and reading right, and a left alignment looks better on the page and draws the eye more naturally into the text. just a thought, i don't notice the news links any more this way or any less when they're on the right

edit: and i agree with KBF, it's really strange having blank gray space off to the left, arguably distracting having visual splash in that area at the top of the page when you're buckling in to read content

double edit: keep in mind i'm a huddle format luddite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...